We have located links that may give you full text access.
Low-molecular-weight Protein Tyrosine Phosphatase Is a Possible Biomarker for Predicting Postoperative Biochemical Recurrence in Prostate Cancer With Negative Surgical Margins.
Anticancer Research 2019 Februrary
BACKGROUND/AIM: For prostate cancer, positive surgical margins are considered an important predictor of biochemical recurrence. However, biochemical recurrence is observed in approximately 20% of cases, even with negative surgical margins, and some cases require salvage therapy. The elevated expression of low-molecular-weight protein tyrosine phosphatase (LMW-PTP, MW 18 kDa) is associated with a poor prognosis of certain cancers. In this study, we investigated whether the LMW-PTP expression levels could be used as a biomarker of recurrence in prostate cancer with negative surgical margins.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The subjects of this retrospective study were 119 patients who underwent total prostatectomy with negative resection margins. LMW-PTP expression was categorized either as a high-expression group or as a low-expression group bye two pathologists. Subsequently, we examined the relationship between LMW-PTP expression levels and clinicopathological factors including biochemical recurrence.
RESULTS: Evaluation of the immunostained samples by two pathologists was highly reliable, with an Intraclass correlation (ICC) score for two distinct measurements of 0.77 and 0.98, respectively. Seventy-three patients (61.3%) were placed in the LMW-PTP high expression group; and 46 patients (38.7%) were placed in the low expression group. The log-rank test revealed early biochemical recurrence in the high LMW-PTP expression group (p=0.0001). In addition, pathological T stage (p=0.004), lymphatic invasion (p=0.0456), Ki-67 labeling index (p=0.0002), and biochemical recurrence (p<0.0001) were more frequently identified in the LMW-PTP high expression group. Furthermore, multivariate analyses revealed that a high LMW-PTP expression level was an independent prognostic factor for biochemical recurrence (HR=3.14, 95% CI=1.37-8.07, p=0.0057). In addition, Ki-67 labeling indices were significantly higher in the high-expression group compared to the low-expression group (p<0.0001).
CONCLUSION: LMW-PTP can be assessed using a single immunostaining protocol in a highly reproducible fashion. Tt may, thus, be applied clinically to establish the required postoperative follow-up period and determine the necessity for salvage therapy in cases of prostate cancer with negative surgical margins. LMW-PTP has the potential to be a highly useful prognostic biomarker and a therapeutic target in conjunction with other factors, such as the Gleason Score, the pathological T stage and the PSA level.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The subjects of this retrospective study were 119 patients who underwent total prostatectomy with negative resection margins. LMW-PTP expression was categorized either as a high-expression group or as a low-expression group bye two pathologists. Subsequently, we examined the relationship between LMW-PTP expression levels and clinicopathological factors including biochemical recurrence.
RESULTS: Evaluation of the immunostained samples by two pathologists was highly reliable, with an Intraclass correlation (ICC) score for two distinct measurements of 0.77 and 0.98, respectively. Seventy-three patients (61.3%) were placed in the LMW-PTP high expression group; and 46 patients (38.7%) were placed in the low expression group. The log-rank test revealed early biochemical recurrence in the high LMW-PTP expression group (p=0.0001). In addition, pathological T stage (p=0.004), lymphatic invasion (p=0.0456), Ki-67 labeling index (p=0.0002), and biochemical recurrence (p<0.0001) were more frequently identified in the LMW-PTP high expression group. Furthermore, multivariate analyses revealed that a high LMW-PTP expression level was an independent prognostic factor for biochemical recurrence (HR=3.14, 95% CI=1.37-8.07, p=0.0057). In addition, Ki-67 labeling indices were significantly higher in the high-expression group compared to the low-expression group (p<0.0001).
CONCLUSION: LMW-PTP can be assessed using a single immunostaining protocol in a highly reproducible fashion. Tt may, thus, be applied clinically to establish the required postoperative follow-up period and determine the necessity for salvage therapy in cases of prostate cancer with negative surgical margins. LMW-PTP has the potential to be a highly useful prognostic biomarker and a therapeutic target in conjunction with other factors, such as the Gleason Score, the pathological T stage and the PSA level.
Full text links
Trending Papers
A Personalized Approach to the Management of Congestion in Acute Heart Failure.Heart International 2023
Potential Mechanisms of the Protective Effects of the Cardiometabolic Drugs Type-2 Sodium-Glucose Transporter Inhibitors and Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists in Heart Failure.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 Februrary 21
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app