JOURNAL ARTICLE
VIDEO-AUDIO MEDIA
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Top-down Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate: Technical Aspects and Early Outcomes.

Urology 2019 April
OBJECTIVE: To clarify the key steps and evaluate the early results of the recently introduced top-down holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP).1,2 This technique was developed to shorten the steep learning curve associated with the conventional approach.

PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixty patients with a median age of 73 years (54-88) underwent HoLEP between 2017 and 2018. The top-down technique was performed by 1 surgeon (H.E). We used a 100-W holmium: YAG Laser (VersaPulse PowerSuite, Lumenis, Yokneam, Israel) with a 550 μm laser fiber and a 28 Fr continuous flow resectoscope (Karl Storz, GmbH, Tuttlingen, Germany). In this video, we clarified the stages of enucleation: posterior groove incision, 12-o'clock urethral mucosa incision, top-down dissection (anteroposterior direction), apical tissue dissection, bladder neck dissection. We collected data related to prostate size, enucleation time, morcellation time, perioperative complications, and early outcomes.

RESULTS: Fifty-seven percent of patients presented with acute urine retention and the remaining had severe obstructive lower urinary tract symptoms. The median Transrectal Ultrasound (TRUS) prostatic volume was 124 mL (70-266). The median resected volume was 90 g (44-242) with a median enucleation time of 92 minutes (42-131). At 3 months follow-up, we observed that the urine stream significantly improved with a median Qmax 23.6 mL/s (17-42). Two patients (3.3%) had urge incontinence, and 2 other patients (3.3%) had stress incontinence at 3 months follow-up. There were no reported intraoperative complications. We noticed that performing apical dissection from top-down resulted in easy visualization of the mucosal strip. This approach eliminates the need to encircle the mucosal strip reducing enucleation time.

CONCLUSION: The top-down HoLEP technique has emerged as a novel modification to conventional HoLEP. The preliminary results are comparable to the original approach.3,4 In our opinion, the top-down method may reduce the complexity, operating time, and the learning curve for urologists performing the HoLEP procedure.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app