We have located links that may give you full text access.
Evaluation of Microscopic observation drug susceptibility (MODS) assay as a rapid, sensitive and inexpensive test for detection of tuberculosis and multidrug resistant tuberculosis.
Medical Journal, Armed Forces India 2019 January
BACKGROUND: Microscopic observation drug susceptibility (MODS) assay has been suggested as a low cost method for rapid, accurate detection of tuberculosis (TB) and multidrug resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB).
METHODS: A total of 2424 samples collected from 1063 eligible patients of suspected pulmonary or extrapulmonary TB were subjected to MODS assay. Performance of MODS was compared with culture and drug susceptibility testing (DST) by conventional solid Lowenstein-Jensen (LJ) media or liquid Mycobacteria Growth Indicator Tube (MGIT) culture.
RESULTS: When compared to reference gold standard of positivity in either solid or liquid reference culture, the MODS assay had sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of 91.3%, 98.2%, 96.0% and 95.9% respectively. MODS took a median time of 10.3 days to culture positivity as compared to 13.8 days using MGIT and 30.5 days using LJ culture. Culture and DST being concurrent in MODS, the median turnaround time for DST was the same as that for culture i.e. 10.3 days. The overall median turn around time for culture positivity and DST using manual MGIT and LJ medium was 23.6 days and 61.2 days respectively. The concordance between MODS culture and the reference susceptibility method was 97.7% for rifampicin, 95.6% for isoniazid, 98.5% for rifampicin and isoniazid. The cost of performing a single MODS assay was INR 200.
CONCLUSION: MODS is a rapid and sensitive, yet simple and inexpensive test that may be helpful to enhance diagnostic accuracy, and case detection of TB and MDR-TB in resource constrained settings.
METHODS: A total of 2424 samples collected from 1063 eligible patients of suspected pulmonary or extrapulmonary TB were subjected to MODS assay. Performance of MODS was compared with culture and drug susceptibility testing (DST) by conventional solid Lowenstein-Jensen (LJ) media or liquid Mycobacteria Growth Indicator Tube (MGIT) culture.
RESULTS: When compared to reference gold standard of positivity in either solid or liquid reference culture, the MODS assay had sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of 91.3%, 98.2%, 96.0% and 95.9% respectively. MODS took a median time of 10.3 days to culture positivity as compared to 13.8 days using MGIT and 30.5 days using LJ culture. Culture and DST being concurrent in MODS, the median turnaround time for DST was the same as that for culture i.e. 10.3 days. The overall median turn around time for culture positivity and DST using manual MGIT and LJ medium was 23.6 days and 61.2 days respectively. The concordance between MODS culture and the reference susceptibility method was 97.7% for rifampicin, 95.6% for isoniazid, 98.5% for rifampicin and isoniazid. The cost of performing a single MODS assay was INR 200.
CONCLUSION: MODS is a rapid and sensitive, yet simple and inexpensive test that may be helpful to enhance diagnostic accuracy, and case detection of TB and MDR-TB in resource constrained settings.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment.Clinical Research in Cardiology : Official Journal of the German Cardiac Society 2024 April 12
Proximal versus distal diuretics in congestive heart failure.Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2024 Februrary 30
World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification of eosinophilic disorders: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.American Journal of Hematology 2024 March 30
Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy in chronic insomnia: A review of clinical guidelines and case reports.Mental Health Clinician 2023 October
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app