We have located links that may give you full text access.
Journal Article
Meta-Analysis
Systematic Review
Differentiating between hepatocellular carcinoma and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma using contrast-enhanced MRI features: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Clinical Radiology 2019 May
AIM: To identify magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features for differentiating hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) from intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (IHCC) and summarise their diagnostic accuracy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: PubMed and EMBASE were searched for studies that employed MRI features to differentiate HCC from IHCC. Overlapping descriptors used to denote the same imaging finding in different studies were subsumed under a single feature. The pooled diagnostic accuracies, including the diagnostic odds ratios (DORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of the identified features, were calculated using a bivariate random-effects model.
RESULTS: In total, 1,370 patients with HCC and 687 patients with IHCC in 14 studies were included. Fifty-two descriptors were subsumed under 15 MRI features. Of these, 11 features were informative for differentiating HCC from IHCC. The five MRI features favouring HCC were capsule, arterial diffuse enhancement, portal venous washout, conventional washout, and intralesional fat; the six MRI features favouring IHCC were surface retraction, arterial rim enhancement, progressive enhancement, target appearance on diffusion-weighted and hepatobiliary phase (HBP) images, and bile duct dilatation. These features tended to show high specificity, but low sensitivity. Useful MRI features with high DORs (>20) were capsule (34; 95% CI, 5-215) and intralesional fat (23; 4-85) for HCC and arterial rim enhancement (31; 6-160), progressive enhancement (24; 8-73), and target appearance on HBP images (29; 3-261) for IHCC.
CONCLUSION: Eleven informative MRI features for differentiating HCC from IHCC were identified. These features will assist in the accurate diagnosis of these diseases and in disease outcome prediction.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: PubMed and EMBASE were searched for studies that employed MRI features to differentiate HCC from IHCC. Overlapping descriptors used to denote the same imaging finding in different studies were subsumed under a single feature. The pooled diagnostic accuracies, including the diagnostic odds ratios (DORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of the identified features, were calculated using a bivariate random-effects model.
RESULTS: In total, 1,370 patients with HCC and 687 patients with IHCC in 14 studies were included. Fifty-two descriptors were subsumed under 15 MRI features. Of these, 11 features were informative for differentiating HCC from IHCC. The five MRI features favouring HCC were capsule, arterial diffuse enhancement, portal venous washout, conventional washout, and intralesional fat; the six MRI features favouring IHCC were surface retraction, arterial rim enhancement, progressive enhancement, target appearance on diffusion-weighted and hepatobiliary phase (HBP) images, and bile duct dilatation. These features tended to show high specificity, but low sensitivity. Useful MRI features with high DORs (>20) were capsule (34; 95% CI, 5-215) and intralesional fat (23; 4-85) for HCC and arterial rim enhancement (31; 6-160), progressive enhancement (24; 8-73), and target appearance on HBP images (29; 3-261) for IHCC.
CONCLUSION: Eleven informative MRI features for differentiating HCC from IHCC were identified. These features will assist in the accurate diagnosis of these diseases and in disease outcome prediction.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app