We have located links that may give you full text access.
Effects of Feedback on Chest Compression Quality: A Randomized Simulation Study.
Pediatrics 2019 January 31
OBJECTIVES: Our aim for this study was to test whether visual and verbal feedback compared with instructor-led feedback improve the quality of pediatric cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR).
METHODS: There were 653 third-year medical students randomly assigned to practice pediatric CPR on 1 of 2 manikins (infant and adolescent; n = 344 and n = 309, respectively). They were further randomly assigned to 1 of 3 feedback groups: The instructor feedback (IF) group ( n = 225) received traditional, instructor-led feedback without any additional feedback device. The device feedback (DF) group ( n = 223) received real-time visual feedback from a feedback device. The instructor and device feedback (IDF) group ( n = 205) received verbal feedback from an instructor who continuously reviewed the trainees' performance using the feedback device. After the training, participants' CPR performance was assessed on the same manikin while no feedback was being provided.
RESULTS: For the primary outcome of total compression score, participants in the DF and IDF groups performed similarly, with both groups showing scores significantly ( P < .001) better than those of the IF group. The same findings held for correct hand position and the proportion of complete release. For compression rate, the DF group was at the higher end of the guideline for 100 to 120 chest compressions per minute compared with the IF and IDF groups (both P < .001). No effect of feedback on compression depth was found.
CONCLUSIONS: Chest compression performance significantly improved with both visual and verbal feedback compared with instructor-led feedback. Feedback devices should be implemented during pediatric resuscitation training to improve resuscitation performance.
METHODS: There were 653 third-year medical students randomly assigned to practice pediatric CPR on 1 of 2 manikins (infant and adolescent; n = 344 and n = 309, respectively). They were further randomly assigned to 1 of 3 feedback groups: The instructor feedback (IF) group ( n = 225) received traditional, instructor-led feedback without any additional feedback device. The device feedback (DF) group ( n = 223) received real-time visual feedback from a feedback device. The instructor and device feedback (IDF) group ( n = 205) received verbal feedback from an instructor who continuously reviewed the trainees' performance using the feedback device. After the training, participants' CPR performance was assessed on the same manikin while no feedback was being provided.
RESULTS: For the primary outcome of total compression score, participants in the DF and IDF groups performed similarly, with both groups showing scores significantly ( P < .001) better than those of the IF group. The same findings held for correct hand position and the proportion of complete release. For compression rate, the DF group was at the higher end of the guideline for 100 to 120 chest compressions per minute compared with the IF and IDF groups (both P < .001). No effect of feedback on compression depth was found.
CONCLUSIONS: Chest compression performance significantly improved with both visual and verbal feedback compared with instructor-led feedback. Feedback devices should be implemented during pediatric resuscitation training to improve resuscitation performance.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment.Clinical Research in Cardiology : Official Journal of the German Cardiac Society 2024 April 12
Proximal versus distal diuretics in congestive heart failure.Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2024 Februrary 30
Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy in chronic insomnia: A review of clinical guidelines and case reports.Mental Health Clinician 2023 October
World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification of eosinophilic disorders: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.American Journal of Hematology 2024 March 30
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app