Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Transthoracic Rebiopsy for Mutation Analysis in Lung Adenocarcinoma: Outcomes and Risk Factors for the Acquisition of Nondiagnostic Specimens in 199 Patients.

Clinical Lung Cancer 2018 December 32
PURPOSE: To determine the outcomes of transthoracic rebiopsy for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation in patients with lung adenocarcinoma and to explore the clinical and procedure-related risk factors for the acquisition of nondiagnostic rebiopsy specimens.

PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 367 patients with lung adenocarcinoma who underwent transthoracic core needle biopsy for mutation analysis from September 2011 to October 2016. Of these, 199 patients underwent rebiopsy. Patient characteristics, treatment history, target lesion characteristics, and procedure-related factors were evaluated. The adequacy rate of specimens for mutation analysis was evaluated. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed to determine the independent predictors of nondiagnostic specimens.

RESULTS: Ninety percent of specimens (179 of 199) were adequate for mutation analysis. The EGFR mutation (exon 18-21) was 65% (117 of 179) and the EGFR T790M mutation 33% (59 of 179) of specimens. In univariable analysis, an internal low-attenuation area in the target lesion (P = .001) and pleural contact (P = .004) on computed tomography were significant risk factors for nondiagnostic specimens. In multivariable analysis, an internal low-attenuation area in the target lesion (odds ratio = 7.333; 95% confidence interval, 1.755-30.633; P = .006) was an independent predictor for acquisition of nondiagnostic specimens.

CONCLUSION: Image-guided transthoracic rebiopsy to obtain specimens for mutation analysis in lung adenocarcinoma provides high diagnostic accuracy, with a low rate of nondiagnostic specimens. The presence of internal low-attenuation area in the target lesion on computed tomography was an independent predictor for acquiring nondiagnostic specimens.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app