We have located links that may give you full text access.
JOURNAL ARTICLE
VALIDATION STUDY
Evaluation of validity of the STOP-BANG questionnaire in major elective noncardiac surgery.
British Journal of Anaesthesia 2019 Februrary
BACKGROUND: The STOP-BANG questionnaire screens for obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) in surgical patients. In prior research, the association of STOP-BANG scores with comorbidities and outcomes was inconsistent. The objective of this study was to evaluate the validity of the STOP-BANG score.
METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing major elective noncardiac surgery at the University Health Network (Toronto, ON, Canada) between 2011 and 2015. Cross-sectional construct validity was evaluated based on proportions with diagnosed OSA across STOP-BANG strata. Concurrent construct validity was assessed based on the correlation of STOP-BANG with ASA Physical Status (ASA-PS), the Revised Cardiac Risk Index, and the Charlson Comorbidity Index. Predictive validity was assessed based on the adjusted associations of STOP-BANG risk with 30-day mortality (logistic regression), cardiac complications (logistic regression), and length-of-stay (negative binomial regression).
RESULTS: Of 26 068 patients in the cohort, 58% were in the low-risk STOP-BANG stratum, 23% in the intermediate-risk stratum, and 19% in the high-risk stratum. The proportion with previously diagnosed OSA was 4% (n=615) in the low-risk stratum, 12% (n=740) in the intermediate-risk stratum, and 44% (n=2142) in the high-risk stratum. The correlations of STOP-BANG with ASA-PS (Spearman ρ=0.28), Revised Cardiac Risk Index (ρ=0.24), and Charlson Comorbidity Index (ρ=0.10) were weak, albeit statistically significant (P<0.001). After risk-adjustment, STOP-BANG risk strata were not associated with 30-day mortality, cardiac complications, or length-of-stay.
CONCLUSIONS: The STOP-BANG questionnaire has modest construct validity but did not predict postoperative mortality, hospital length-of-stay, or cardiac complications.
METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing major elective noncardiac surgery at the University Health Network (Toronto, ON, Canada) between 2011 and 2015. Cross-sectional construct validity was evaluated based on proportions with diagnosed OSA across STOP-BANG strata. Concurrent construct validity was assessed based on the correlation of STOP-BANG with ASA Physical Status (ASA-PS), the Revised Cardiac Risk Index, and the Charlson Comorbidity Index. Predictive validity was assessed based on the adjusted associations of STOP-BANG risk with 30-day mortality (logistic regression), cardiac complications (logistic regression), and length-of-stay (negative binomial regression).
RESULTS: Of 26 068 patients in the cohort, 58% were in the low-risk STOP-BANG stratum, 23% in the intermediate-risk stratum, and 19% in the high-risk stratum. The proportion with previously diagnosed OSA was 4% (n=615) in the low-risk stratum, 12% (n=740) in the intermediate-risk stratum, and 44% (n=2142) in the high-risk stratum. The correlations of STOP-BANG with ASA-PS (Spearman ρ=0.28), Revised Cardiac Risk Index (ρ=0.24), and Charlson Comorbidity Index (ρ=0.10) were weak, albeit statistically significant (P<0.001). After risk-adjustment, STOP-BANG risk strata were not associated with 30-day mortality, cardiac complications, or length-of-stay.
CONCLUSIONS: The STOP-BANG questionnaire has modest construct validity but did not predict postoperative mortality, hospital length-of-stay, or cardiac complications.
Full text links
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app