Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Dental Hygiene Students and Faculty Attitudes and Utilization of a Single Source Electronic Textbook Platform.

PURPOSE: Transitioning to interactive e-textbooks has been considered revolutionary for enhancing student learning. However, adopting this technology has been met with hesitation. This study investigates student and faculty attitudes and utilization of mandatory e-textbooks in a dental hygiene program.

METHODS: In 2017, an online questionnaire was distributed to students and a focus group was conducted with faculty to examine their perspectives about using VitalSourceTM . Using a 5-point Likert scale with 5 indicating strongly agree, the questionnaire examined convenience; compatibility with learning style; perceived enjoyment; and usefulness. Open-ended questions captured benefits and challenges. The focus group gathered faculty perspectives. Questionnaire data was analyzed using descriptive statistics. Data from the open-ended questionnaire questions and focus group transcript followed a narrative analysis process.

RESULTS: Survey response was 48% (n=105). Students scored all factors below neutral. Results from four categories showed convenience (M=2.75, SD=0.92); compatibility (M=1.93, SD=0.83); perceived effectiveness (M=2.15, SD=0.90); and perceived usefulness (M=2.36, SD=1.04). A high correlation between all factors suggest they were uniformly rated by students. Majority of students (71%) did not use a textbook greater than once a month. Narrative analysis revealed few benefits; challenges included technical glitches, eyestrain, cost, and inability to choose books as desired. Faculty's perspectives aligned with the students but they appreciated portability of texts and quality of clinical images.

CONCLUSIONS: Students strongly disliked the platform and the online medium and do not frequently access e-textbooks but rely on PowerPoint handouts for studying. Faculty felt e-textbooks do not align with positive learning experiences. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app