Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Potential mortality benefit from secondary prophylaxis following CMV treatment completion may be due to confounding by transplant organ type.

We have read with interest the paper by Serrano-Alonso et al. regarding outcomes in solid organ transplant recipients who did and did not receive secondary prophylaxis (SP) following a treated episode of CMV disease. This study included 126 heart, liver and kidney transplant recipients of whom 103 (83%) received SP for a mean duration of 49 ± 29 days. Consistent with our recently published study and others, there was no overall benefit in terms of CMV relapse with the use of SP. Death, however, occurred in 6/103 (6%) patients who received SP compared to 6/21 (29%) who did not. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app