We have located links that may give you full text access.
Characteristics of Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing of Patients with Borderline Mean Pulmonary Artery Pressure.
Clinical Respiratory Journal 2019 January 23
BACKGROUND: Pulmonary hypertension patients with mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) ≥ 25 mmHg had impaired cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET). Borderline mean pulmonary pressures (boPAP; 21-24 mmHg) represents early pulmonary vasculopathy. The CPET characteristics of boPAP is a matter of discussion. We aimed to determine the CPET profile of such borderline hemodynamics.
METHODS: A matched case-control study was conducted on consecutive boPAP patients at the Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital between Jan 2012 and Jan 2017. Hemodynamics, echocardiography, the pulmonary function test (PFT) and CPET parameters were compared between boPAP patients and normal mPAP patients which were matched 1:1 by sex and age. Conditional logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the efficacy of CPET in detecting boPAP.
RESULTS: A total of 48 patients underwent RHC and CPET (24 Normal, 24 boPAP). There were no differences in the demographics, echocardiography and PFT. BoPAP patients had significantly decreased VO2 at the anaerobic threshold and peak VO2 /kg (858.4 ± 246.5 ml/min vs. 727.9 ± 228.0 ml/min, P = 0.037; 21.1 ± 6.4 mL/min/kg vs. 15.5 ± 5.6 mL/min/kg, P = 0.001, respectively). Significant differences were not observed in ventilation efficiency. A trend of impaired oxygen pulse and submaximal exercise tolerance were observed in boPAP patients. Conditional logistical regression analysis revealed the risk of boPAP increased by 2.493 (95% confident interval: 1.388 to 4.476, P = 0.002) with every 5 mL/min/kg decrease in peak VO2 /kg.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with boPAP have a greater prevalence of exercise intolerance, a trend of impaired oxygen pulse and submaximal exercise tolerance. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
METHODS: A matched case-control study was conducted on consecutive boPAP patients at the Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital between Jan 2012 and Jan 2017. Hemodynamics, echocardiography, the pulmonary function test (PFT) and CPET parameters were compared between boPAP patients and normal mPAP patients which were matched 1:1 by sex and age. Conditional logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the efficacy of CPET in detecting boPAP.
RESULTS: A total of 48 patients underwent RHC and CPET (24 Normal, 24 boPAP). There were no differences in the demographics, echocardiography and PFT. BoPAP patients had significantly decreased VO2 at the anaerobic threshold and peak VO2 /kg (858.4 ± 246.5 ml/min vs. 727.9 ± 228.0 ml/min, P = 0.037; 21.1 ± 6.4 mL/min/kg vs. 15.5 ± 5.6 mL/min/kg, P = 0.001, respectively). Significant differences were not observed in ventilation efficiency. A trend of impaired oxygen pulse and submaximal exercise tolerance were observed in boPAP patients. Conditional logistical regression analysis revealed the risk of boPAP increased by 2.493 (95% confident interval: 1.388 to 4.476, P = 0.002) with every 5 mL/min/kg decrease in peak VO2 /kg.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with boPAP have a greater prevalence of exercise intolerance, a trend of impaired oxygen pulse and submaximal exercise tolerance. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app