Comparative Study
Journal Article
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Efficiency of Tissue Penetration by Currents Induced by 3 Electrotherapeutic Techniques: A Comparative Study Using a Novel Deep-Tissue Measuring Technique.

Physical Therapy 2019 May 2
BACKGROUND: Electrotherapy provides a wide range of treatment alternatives for musculoskeletal pathologies. However, for the electrical stimulation to exert a significant therapeutic effect, the induced current must often penetrate deep inside the target tissue.

OBJECTIVE: The objective was to systematically compare the penetration efficiency of 3 electrotherapeutic stimulation modalities: transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS), interferential (IF) stimulation, and combined therapy with pulsed ultrasound and IF current (CTPI).

DESIGN: This was a comparative, experimental laboratory study.

METHODS: The penetration efficiency was evaluated as a voltage difference between 2 of an 8-contact spinal cord stimulation array. Each of 20 participants with a preimplanted spinal cord stimulation array was stimulated with TENS (3 different electrode configurations), IF current (3 configurations), and CTPI (1 configuration).

RESULTS: Significant differences in penetration efficiency were found between the various stimulation conditions and electrode configurations. CTPI showed the highest penetration efficiency, followed by IF, and finally TENS. Penetration efficiency was inversely and significantly correlated with skinfold thickness in all conditions, but this correlation was lowest for the CTPI stimulation.

LIMITATIONS: Our study design did not include a condition of combined therapy with pulsed ultrasound and TENS, and it did not directly control for current or voltage density under the stimulating electrodes. In addition, further research is required to determine whether a higher stimulation intensity of the target tissue is advantageous clinically.

CONCLUSIONS: Pending further testing, CTPI stimulation could prove more effective than IF and TENS in reaching deeper tissues, especially considering the variability in adipose tissue thickness in the population, for example, in cases of patients with obesity.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app