Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Indications and diagnostic yield of endomyocardial biopsies for unexplained cardiomyopathy, a single center experience.

Acta Cardiologica 2019 January 17
BACKGROUND: Endomyocardial biopsies (EMBs) remain the golden standard to diagnose underlying pathophysiologic process in heart failure (HF), when potential therapeutic decisions cannot be made by non-invasive techniques. However, changes in the field of non-invasive diagnostic testing might have an impact on the need for performing an EMB in certain scenarios.

METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of consecutive EMBs performed in a single, non-academic, tertiary-care centre. EMBs were performed between February 2009 and March 2018. Baseline characteristics including non-invasive imaging and hemodynamic profile were assessed. Indications of EMBs were analysed in accordance with the 2007-AHA/ACC/ESC-scientific statement on EMBs.

RESULTS: A total of 57 patients (74% male) were included. The overall diagnostic yield was 58%, with a trend towards a higher yield in left-side (64%) versus right-side EMBs (45%; p = .346). The majority of patients (88%) underwent EMBs for a class IIa-recommendation, 9% for a class-I recommendation and the remaining patients for a class IIb-indication. Of the EMBs for a class IIa indication, 82% (n = 47) was for an unexplained restrictive cardiomyopathy, in which 53% (n = 25) revealed a diagnosis (of whom n = 23 patients had amyloidosis). Subtyping of the EMBs with a pathologic diagnosis of amyloidosis revealed that 52% (n = 12) had transthyretin amyloidosis (ATTR) and 43% (n = 10) had light-chain amyloidosis (AL). Overall one major (1.7%) and one minor (1.7%) complication occurred following the EMB-procedure.

CONCLUSIONS: When following the AHA/ACC/ESC-scientific statement on EMBs, the performance of EMBs had a high diagnostic yield, with acceptable complication rates. However, in patients presenting with an unexplained restricted cardiomyopathy, technetium-labelled bone scanning could offer a non-invasive approach to establishing the diagnosis of ATTR, mitigating the need for EMBs in a subset of patients.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app