Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Does heart failure-specific health status identify patients with bothersome symptoms, depression, anxiety and/or poorer spiritual well-being?

Aims: Patients with HF often have underrecognized symptoms, depression, anxiety and poorer spiritual well-being ("QoL domains"). Ideally all patients should have HF-specific health status and QoL domains routinely evaluated; however, lack of time and resources are limiting in most clinical settings. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate whether HF-specific health status was associated with QoL domains and to identify a score warranting further evaluation of QoL domain deficits.

Methods and results: Participants (N = 314) enrolled in the Collaborative Care to Alleviate Symptoms and Adjust to Illness trial completed measures of HF-specific health status (KCCQ (score 0-100, 0=worst health status)), additional symptoms (Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale), depression (Patient Health Questionnaire-9), anxiety (Generalized Anxiety Disorder -7), and spiritual well-being (Facit-Sp) at baseline. Mean±SD KCCQ score was 46.9±19.3, mean age was 65.5±11.4, and 79% were male. Prevalence of QoL domain deficits ranged from 11% (nausea) to 47% (depression). Sensitivity/specificity of KCCQ for each QoL domain ranged from 20-40%/80-96% for KCCQ≤25, 61-84%/48-62% for KCCQ≤50, 84-97%/26-40% for KCCQ≤60, and 96-100%/8-13% for KCCQ≤75. Patients with KCCQ≤60 had mean±SD 4.5±2.5 QoL domain deficits (maximum 12), vs. 1.6±1.6 for KCCQ>60 (p < 0.001). Similar results were seen for KCCQ ≤25 (6.6±2.4 vs. 3.3±2.4), KCCQ≤50 (4.8±2.6 vs. 2.5±2) and KCCQ≤75 (4.0±2.6 vs. 1.0±1.2) (all p < 00001). Conclusions KCCQ≤60 had good sensitivity for each QoL domain deficit and for patients with at least one QoL domain deficit. Screening for QoL domain deficits should target patients with lower KCCQ scores based on a clinic's KCCQ score distribution and clinical resources for addressing QoL domain deficits.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app