We have located links that may give you full text access.
Drivers of HIV infection among cisgender and transgender female sex worker populations in Baltimore city: Results from the SAPPHIRE study.
Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes : JAIDS 2019 January 9
OBJECTIVE: To determine and compare risk factors for HIV infection among cisgender female (CFSW) and transgender female (TFSW) sex workers.
DESIGN: Baseline data from a cohort study (SAPPHIRE) of street-based CFSW and TFSW in Baltimore, MD.
METHODS: Women were queried about individual (e.g., drug use), interpersonal (e.g., sexual abuse) and structural (e.g., housing) risk factors and questioned on their sex work risk environment. Women were tested for HIV/STIs. We used logistic regression to identify key risk factors of prevalent HIV in each population.
RESULTS: We recruited 262 CFSW and 62 TFSW between 2016-2017. Compared to TFSW, CFSW were more likely to be white (66% vs. 0%), recently homeless (62% vs. 23%, p<0.001), regularly gone to sleep hungry (54% vs. 16%, p<0.001), and to inject drugs (71% vs. 4%, p<0.001). HIV prevalence was 8 times greater in TFSW than CFSW (40% vs 5%, p <0.001). All participants reported high rates of lifetime physical and sexual violence. Cocaine injection (aOR=3.65, 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.12-11.88), food insecurity (aOR=1.92, 95% CI=1.22-3.04), and >5 years in sex work (aOR=5.40, 95% CI=2.10-13.90) were independently associated with HIV among CFSW. Childhood sexual abuse (aOR=4.56, 95% CI=1.20-17.32), being in sex work due to lack of opportunities (aOR=4.81, 95% CI=1.29-17.90) and >5 years in sex work (aOR=5.62, 95% CI=1.44-21.85) were independently associated with HIV among TFSW.
CONCLUSIONS: Although distinct, both populations share a history of extensive childhood abuse and later life structural vulnerability, which drive their engagement in street-based sex work and their HIV risk profiles.
DESIGN: Baseline data from a cohort study (SAPPHIRE) of street-based CFSW and TFSW in Baltimore, MD.
METHODS: Women were queried about individual (e.g., drug use), interpersonal (e.g., sexual abuse) and structural (e.g., housing) risk factors and questioned on their sex work risk environment. Women were tested for HIV/STIs. We used logistic regression to identify key risk factors of prevalent HIV in each population.
RESULTS: We recruited 262 CFSW and 62 TFSW between 2016-2017. Compared to TFSW, CFSW were more likely to be white (66% vs. 0%), recently homeless (62% vs. 23%, p<0.001), regularly gone to sleep hungry (54% vs. 16%, p<0.001), and to inject drugs (71% vs. 4%, p<0.001). HIV prevalence was 8 times greater in TFSW than CFSW (40% vs 5%, p <0.001). All participants reported high rates of lifetime physical and sexual violence. Cocaine injection (aOR=3.65, 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.12-11.88), food insecurity (aOR=1.92, 95% CI=1.22-3.04), and >5 years in sex work (aOR=5.40, 95% CI=2.10-13.90) were independently associated with HIV among CFSW. Childhood sexual abuse (aOR=4.56, 95% CI=1.20-17.32), being in sex work due to lack of opportunities (aOR=4.81, 95% CI=1.29-17.90) and >5 years in sex work (aOR=5.62, 95% CI=1.44-21.85) were independently associated with HIV among TFSW.
CONCLUSIONS: Although distinct, both populations share a history of extensive childhood abuse and later life structural vulnerability, which drive their engagement in street-based sex work and their HIV risk profiles.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app