We have located links that may give you full text access.
Medication reconciliation: Predictors of risk of unintentional medication discrepancies in the cardiology department.
Archives of Cardiovascular Diseases 2019 January 11
BACKGROUND: Medication reconciliation is a powerful formal process to decrease medication errors, but it has proved to be complex and time consuming.
AIMS: To describe the frequency and types of medication discrepancies (between previous treatment and medication order at admission), and to identify predictors of unintentional medication discrepancies (UMDs).
METHODS: This interventional study was carried out in the cardiology department of a French teaching hospital. Medication reconciliation was conducted at admission to the cardiology department over 1 month in 2016 by trained pharmacists for: (1) determination of best possible medication history using multiple sources; (2) comparison with the patient's admission medication order and identification of discrepancies; and (3) classification of discrepancies (intentional/unintentional) with the physician. Associations between UMDs and various factors were examined.
RESULTS: Overall, 100 patients were included (mean age 67.6±16.7 years; 56 men). The reconciliation process identified 544 drug discrepancies, 77 of which were UMDs; these occurred in 42 patients. The most common UMD type was omission (70.1%). Inability to speak French (P=0.007), low educational level (P=0.004), admission to a non-intensive care unit (P=0.019), two or more co-morbidities (P=0.001) and eight or more drugs on the admission order (P=0.004) were significantly associated with UMDs. Educational level remained significantly and independently associated with UMDs in a multivariable analysis after adjustment for factors that were statistically significant in the univariate analysis.
CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the high risk of medication discrepancies and the factors associated with UMDs. Our results allowed us to identify patients who should receive priority medication reconciliation in a cardiology department.
AIMS: To describe the frequency and types of medication discrepancies (between previous treatment and medication order at admission), and to identify predictors of unintentional medication discrepancies (UMDs).
METHODS: This interventional study was carried out in the cardiology department of a French teaching hospital. Medication reconciliation was conducted at admission to the cardiology department over 1 month in 2016 by trained pharmacists for: (1) determination of best possible medication history using multiple sources; (2) comparison with the patient's admission medication order and identification of discrepancies; and (3) classification of discrepancies (intentional/unintentional) with the physician. Associations between UMDs and various factors were examined.
RESULTS: Overall, 100 patients were included (mean age 67.6±16.7 years; 56 men). The reconciliation process identified 544 drug discrepancies, 77 of which were UMDs; these occurred in 42 patients. The most common UMD type was omission (70.1%). Inability to speak French (P=0.007), low educational level (P=0.004), admission to a non-intensive care unit (P=0.019), two or more co-morbidities (P=0.001) and eight or more drugs on the admission order (P=0.004) were significantly associated with UMDs. Educational level remained significantly and independently associated with UMDs in a multivariable analysis after adjustment for factors that were statistically significant in the univariate analysis.
CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the high risk of medication discrepancies and the factors associated with UMDs. Our results allowed us to identify patients who should receive priority medication reconciliation in a cardiology department.
Full text links
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app