We have located links that may give you full text access.
Active pelvic tilt is reduced in athletes with groin injury; a case-controlled study.
Physical Therapy in Sport 2019 March
OBJECTIVE: To study if athletes with groin injury had less active pelvic tilt (APT) than non-injured controls.
DESIGN: Case-control.
SETTING: Sports physiotherapy clinics and sports clubs.
PARTICIPANTS: 17 athletes (Tegner>5, age 25.1(5.2) with groin injury and 27 healthy controls (Tenger>5, age 24.4(3.6)).
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Active pelvic tilt, defining the ability of an individual to actively tilt the pelvis anteriorly and posteriorly over a frontal axis, and hip range of motion (HROM) parameters.
RESULTS: Linear regression model associations with generalized estimated equations revealed that APT was lower on injured sides compared to non-injured for total (21.1(7.1) vs. 27.2(8.0), P = .003, effect size (ES) = 0.8) and anterior (10.2(5.9) vs. 13.7(4.8), P = .004, ES = 0.65) APT. Posterior APT (-10.9(3.6) vs. -13.4(5.2), P = .06, ES = 0.56) showed a trend towards being lower in those with groin injury. HROM parameters were not found associated.
CONCLUSIONS: Total active and anterior pelvic tilt were lower on the injured side in athletes with groin injury when compared to non-injured sides and healthy controls. This may be a relevant factor to consider in rehabilitation. Whether this is a cause or effect cannot be ascertained due to the cross sectional study design.
DESIGN: Case-control.
SETTING: Sports physiotherapy clinics and sports clubs.
PARTICIPANTS: 17 athletes (Tegner>5, age 25.1(5.2) with groin injury and 27 healthy controls (Tenger>5, age 24.4(3.6)).
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Active pelvic tilt, defining the ability of an individual to actively tilt the pelvis anteriorly and posteriorly over a frontal axis, and hip range of motion (HROM) parameters.
RESULTS: Linear regression model associations with generalized estimated equations revealed that APT was lower on injured sides compared to non-injured for total (21.1(7.1) vs. 27.2(8.0), P = .003, effect size (ES) = 0.8) and anterior (10.2(5.9) vs. 13.7(4.8), P = .004, ES = 0.65) APT. Posterior APT (-10.9(3.6) vs. -13.4(5.2), P = .06, ES = 0.56) showed a trend towards being lower in those with groin injury. HROM parameters were not found associated.
CONCLUSIONS: Total active and anterior pelvic tilt were lower on the injured side in athletes with groin injury when compared to non-injured sides and healthy controls. This may be a relevant factor to consider in rehabilitation. Whether this is a cause or effect cannot be ascertained due to the cross sectional study design.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app