JOURNAL ARTICLE
META-ANALYSIS
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Interventions to Try to Prevent Preterm Birth in Women With a History of Conization: A Systematic Review and Meta-analyses.

OBJECTIVES: The most effective preterm birth (PTB) intervention is unknown for women who are at risk of PTB due to a history of conization. The objective of this systematic review was to determine whether PTB interventions, progesterone, cerclage, and pessary decrease the risk of PTB compared to no treatment in singleton-and separately in twin-pregnancies of women with history of conization.

METHODS: We searched Cochrane Central, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and ClinicalTrials.gov from January 1994 until May 2017. In duplicate, we reviewed titles, abstracts, full texts, extracted data, and assessed quality. We included RCTs and observational studies. Our primary outcomes were PTB <34 weeks, PTB <37 weeks, and neonatal mortality. We performed random effects meta-analyses and generated ORs with 95% CIs.

RESULTS: We screened 762 nonduplicate titles and abstracts and assessed 91 full texts. After contacting authors, we included nine studies. Women in the cerclage group were more likely to have a short cervix or another risk factor for PTB, raising the possibility of confounding by indication. In women with a history of conization and a singleton who received a cerclage compared to those who did not, the ORs of PTB <34 weeks was 3.99 (95% CI 0.67-23.62, three studies, I2  = 65%); of PTB <37 weeks was 2.10 (95% CI 0.87-5.05, four studies, I2  = 0%); and of neonatal mortality was 8.33 (95% CI 0.22-320.38, two studies, I2  = N/A). We did not find any studies comparing either progesterone or pessary to no treatment. Data for twins were very scarce.

CONCLUSION: In women with a previous conization and a current singleton gestation, the existing evidence, which is likely limited due to confounding by indication, does not support cerclage or other interventions used to try to decrease PTB.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app