Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

The use of ultrasound-indicated cerclage or cervical pessary in asymptomatic twin pregnancies with a short cervix at midgestation.

INTRODUCTION: Spontaneous preterm birth in women with a twin pregnancy is one of the main causes of perinatal mortality and morbidity. Our aim was to review the perinatal outcome of asymptomatic twin pregnancies with a sonographic short cervical length during the second trimester treated with an ultrasound-indicated cerclage or cervical pessary.

MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective study on asymptomatic twin pregnancies with a short cervix (≤ 25 mm) at transvaginal ultrasound examination during the second trimester treated with a cervical cerclage or pessary (2001-2017). The rate of preterm birth < 28, 32 and 34 weeks of gestation, neonatal mortality, neonatal morbidity and composite adverse neonatal outcome were compared in the groups of women treated with cerclage or pessary.

RESULTS: Seventy-four twin pregnancies underwent a cerclage while a cervical pessary was inserted in 34 women with twins at our Department: 36 women with an ultrasound-indicated cerclage and 20 with a pessary were included in the analysis. Median gestational age at delivery was higher in women treated with cerclage compared with those with pessary placement (P = .02) and the rate of preterm birth before 34 weeks of gestation was lower in the cerclage group (P = .03). Admissions to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit were more frequent in pregnancies with pessary (P = .01), the length of admission was longer (P = .005) and composite adverse neonatal outcome occurred more often (P = .03) compared with the cerclage group.

CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasound-indicated cerclage appears to reduce the rate of preterm birth before 34 weeks of gestation in asymptomatic twin pregnancies with a short cervix during the second trimester, and also the composite adverse neonatal outcome compared with pessary.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app