Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Pharmacokinetic comparison of gemigliptin 50 mg and metformin 500 mg as a fixed-dose combination and loose combination .

BACKGROUND: Metformin and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-IV) inhibitors are commonly combined to treat patients with diabetes mellitus (DM). A new fixed-dose combination (FDC) drug containing gemigliptin, a DPP-IV inhibitor, and sustained-release metformin has been developed. This study aimed to compare the PKs and tolerability of FDC versus loose combination of gemigliptin 50 mg and metformin 500 mg.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: A randomized, open-label, two-treatment, two-period, two-sequence, crossover study was conducted in 28 healthy subjects, who received a single oral dose of an FDC tablet of gemigliptin (50 mg) and sustained-release metformin (500 mg) or were coadministered gemigliptin (50 mg) and extended-release metformin (500 mg) with a 1-week washout. Serial blood samples were collected up to 48 hours after study drug administration, and the plasma concentrations of gemigliptin, LC15-0636 (active metabolite of gemigliptin), and metformin were determined using a validated LC-MS/MS method. Pharmacokinetic parameters were derived using a noncompartmental method. Safety and tolerability were evaluated based on vital signs, adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, and electrocardiography.

RESULTS: The concentration-time profiles of gemigliptin and metformin were similar when they were administered as FDC or were coadministered. The geometric mean ratio (GMR) and its 90% CIs of Cmax for gemigliptin, LC15-0636, and metformin were 0.93 (0.85 - 1.02), 1.00 (0.94 - 1.06), and 1.03 (0.98 - 1.09), respectively. The corresponding values of AUClast were 0.97 (0.93 - 1.01), 1.00 (0.97 - 1.04), and 1.00 (0.95 - 1.05), respectively. There were no clinically meaningful differences in safety and tolerability.

CONCLUSION: When comparing the AUClast and Cmax of gemigliptin, LC15-0636, and metformin, the 90% CIs were all within the range of 0.8 - 1.25, which is the commonly accepted range for evaluating bioequivalence.
.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app