We have located links that may give you full text access.
Point Spread Function Reconstruction for Integrated 18F-FET PET/MRI in Patients With Glioma: Does It Affect SUVs and Respective Tumor-to-Background Ratios?
Clinical Nuclear Medicine 2019 April
PURPOSE: Semiquantitative F-FET PET assessment using the tumor's SUV or tumor-to-background ratios (TBRs) can separate gliomas from peritumoral tissue or progression from pseudoprogression. This study investigated if point spread function (PSF) reconstruction of F-FET PET data affects SUV-based dignity assessment.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study is a retrospective analysis of 87 glioma patients (female, 36; male, 51; age, 48 [13-81] years) undergoing F-FET PET/MRI for staging (n = 17) or restaging (n = 70). PET was reconstructed using ordered-subset expectation maximization with and without PSF. Lesions were delineated with semiautomated background-adapted thresholding relative to SUVmax; background was delineated contralaterally. Comparative measurements with a National Electrical Manufacturers Association International Electrotechnical Commission PET body phantom (sphere-to-background ratios, 8:1 and 4:1) were performed.
RESULTS: PSF showed significantly higher tumor SUVmax (median difference, +0.1; interquartile range, 0.04-0.18), SUVmean (+0.05; 0.03-0.08), TBRmax|mean (+0.1; 0.04-0.2), and TBRmean|mean (+0.06; 0.03-0.09) than non-PSF (P < 0.001). Background SUVmean was unaffected. In patients and phantom, differences between PSF and non-PSF increased with TBR and decreased with lesion's PET volume. Differences only exceeded 0.2 SUV for SUVmax or 0.1 SUV for SUVmean if TBR was greater than 3 and lesion's PET volume was less than 10 mL (d = 27 mm). Dignity assessment by PSF and non-PSF was concordant in all patients examined for staging (cutoff, TBRmean|mean > 1.6; positive, 14; negative, 3) and restaging (cutoff, TBRmax|mean > 2.0; positive, 67; negative, 3).
CONCLUSIONS: PSF increased tumor SUVmax and SUVmean compared with non-PSF F-FET PET/MRI data, especially in small lesions with high TBR (>3). However, dignity assessment using established TBR cutoffs was not affected.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study is a retrospective analysis of 87 glioma patients (female, 36; male, 51; age, 48 [13-81] years) undergoing F-FET PET/MRI for staging (n = 17) or restaging (n = 70). PET was reconstructed using ordered-subset expectation maximization with and without PSF. Lesions were delineated with semiautomated background-adapted thresholding relative to SUVmax; background was delineated contralaterally. Comparative measurements with a National Electrical Manufacturers Association International Electrotechnical Commission PET body phantom (sphere-to-background ratios, 8:1 and 4:1) were performed.
RESULTS: PSF showed significantly higher tumor SUVmax (median difference, +0.1; interquartile range, 0.04-0.18), SUVmean (+0.05; 0.03-0.08), TBRmax|mean (+0.1; 0.04-0.2), and TBRmean|mean (+0.06; 0.03-0.09) than non-PSF (P < 0.001). Background SUVmean was unaffected. In patients and phantom, differences between PSF and non-PSF increased with TBR and decreased with lesion's PET volume. Differences only exceeded 0.2 SUV for SUVmax or 0.1 SUV for SUVmean if TBR was greater than 3 and lesion's PET volume was less than 10 mL (d = 27 mm). Dignity assessment by PSF and non-PSF was concordant in all patients examined for staging (cutoff, TBRmean|mean > 1.6; positive, 14; negative, 3) and restaging (cutoff, TBRmax|mean > 2.0; positive, 67; negative, 3).
CONCLUSIONS: PSF increased tumor SUVmax and SUVmean compared with non-PSF F-FET PET/MRI data, especially in small lesions with high TBR (>3). However, dignity assessment using established TBR cutoffs was not affected.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices 
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app