Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Monitoring haemodynamic response to fluid-challenge in ICU: Comparison of pressure recording analytical method and oesophageal Doppler.

BACKGROUND: The ability of the pressure recording analytical method (PRAM) in tracking change in cardiac output (ΔCO) after a fluid challenge in ICU needs to be evaluated with the most contemporary comparison methods recommended by experts.

OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to report the trending ability of PRAM in tracking ΔCO after a fluid challenge in ICU and to compare this with oesophageal Doppler monitoring (ODM).

DESIGN: Prospective, observational study.

SETTING: Hôpital Lariboisière and Hôpital Européen George Pompidou, Paris, France, from April 2016 to December 2017.

PATIENTS: Critically ill patients admitted to ICU with monitoring of CO monitored by ODM and invasive arterial pressure.

INTERVENTION: ΔCO after fluid challenge was simultaneously registered with ODM and PRAM connected to the arterial line.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Polar statistics (mean angular bias, radial limits of agreement and polar concordance rate) and clinical concordance evaluation (error grid and clinical concordance rate). Predictors of bias were determined.

RESULTS: Sixty-eight fluid challenge were administered in 49 patients. At the time of fluid challenge, almost all were mechanically ventilated (99%), with 85% receiving norepinephrine. Admission diagnosis was septic shock in 70% of patients. Patients had a Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score of 10 [7 to 12] and a median Simplified Acute Physiology Score II of 61 [49 to 69]. Relative ΔCO bias was 7.8 (6.3°) with radial limits of agreement of ±41.7°, polar concordance rate 80% and clinical concordance rate 74%. ΔCO bias was associated with baseline bias (P = 0.007). Baseline bias was associated with radial location of the arterial line (P = 0.03).

CONCLUSION: When compared with ODM, PRAM has insufficient performance to track ΔCO induced by fluid challenge in ICU patients. Baseline bias is an independent predictor of trending bias.

TRIAL REGISTRATION: IRB 00010254-2016-033.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

Managing Alcohol Withdrawal Syndrome.Annals of Emergency Medicine 2024 March 26

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app