We have located links that may give you full text access.
Persian version of thirst distress scale (TDS) in patients on hemodialysis: Factor structure and psychometric properties .
Clinical Nephrology 2018 December 12
BACKGROUND: Patients on hemodialysis can experience thirst distress. However, there is no valid and reliable Persian instrument to measure this condition in such patients. The present study aims to determine the psychometric properties of the Persian version of the thirst distress scale (TDS) for patients on hemodialysis.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Our sample consisted of 142 hemodialysis patients completed the TDS Persian version. The face, content, and construct validity of the scale were ascertained. Reliability was also assessed using internal consistency, construct reliability, and intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC).
RESULTS: Construct validity determined one factor with an eigenvalue greater than 0.7. The model revealed good fitness (χ2 (121, N = 142) = 269.32, p < 0.001; χ2/df = 2.225, goodness of fit index (GFI) = 0.912, normed fit index (NFI) = 0.866, comparative fit index (CFI) = 0.926, incremental fit index (IFI) = 0.961, and root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) = 0.089 (90% confidence interval = 0.069 - 0.109)). The internal consistency, construct reliability, and ICC were greater than 0.70. The scale's convergent validity was demonstrated.
CONCLUSION: This study confirmed the acceptable psychometric properties and the factor structure of the TDS in Iranian patients on hemodialysis. .
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Our sample consisted of 142 hemodialysis patients completed the TDS Persian version. The face, content, and construct validity of the scale were ascertained. Reliability was also assessed using internal consistency, construct reliability, and intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC).
RESULTS: Construct validity determined one factor with an eigenvalue greater than 0.7. The model revealed good fitness (χ2 (121, N = 142) = 269.32, p < 0.001; χ2/df = 2.225, goodness of fit index (GFI) = 0.912, normed fit index (NFI) = 0.866, comparative fit index (CFI) = 0.926, incremental fit index (IFI) = 0.961, and root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) = 0.089 (90% confidence interval = 0.069 - 0.109)). The internal consistency, construct reliability, and ICC were greater than 0.70. The scale's convergent validity was demonstrated.
CONCLUSION: This study confirmed the acceptable psychometric properties and the factor structure of the TDS in Iranian patients on hemodialysis. .
Full text links
Trending Papers
A Personalized Approach to the Management of Congestion in Acute Heart Failure.Heart International 2023
Potential Mechanisms of the Protective Effects of the Cardiometabolic Drugs Type-2 Sodium-Glucose Transporter Inhibitors and Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists in Heart Failure.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 Februrary 21
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app