Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Clinical Application of Three-Dimensionally Printed Biomaterial Polycaprolactone (PCL) in Augmentation Rhinoplasty.

Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 2018 November 30
BACKGROUND: This clinical study aimed to investigate the safety and surgical outcome of three-dimensionally (3D) fabricated polycaprolactone (PCL) mesh in rhinoplasty. In particular, this study explored how a 3D-printed PCL mesh performs as a bioabsorbable scaffold after a long period following implantation.

METHODS: A retrospective review of 101 patients who received primary or secondary rhinoplasty with a PCL mesh was performed. Patient demographics and surgery-related outcomes were examined. Clinical efficacy and safety were evaluated using the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale at postoperative 18 months. From two revisional cases, a biopsy specimen of implanted PCL was acquired and histopathological analysis was performed.

RESULTS: Of all the patients, 98.0% showed no postoperative infection-related foreign body reaction or distinct abnormal reaction, and the implants were observed to maintain long-term efficacy until 18-month follow-up. In patients who received spreader grafts, significant differences between preoperative and postoperative Cottle sign scores were found. Histopathological analysis showed features of adjacent tissue infiltration into pores of the PCL mesh and regeneration of neo-cartilaginous tissue and collagen around the mesh 20 months after implantation.

CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that a novel biodegradable PCL mesh with a 3D structure is a safe and effective material for corrective rhinoplasty because it is easy to use and capable of maintaining its volume in the long term without foreign body response. This biocompatible material will have a wide range of applications as the most suitable alternative to nonabsorbable materials in rhinoplasty and reconstruction surgeries, such as fashioning spreader grafts and septal extension grafts.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app