We have located links that may give you full text access.
Satisfaction with shortening the palatal extension of a mouthguard for water polo players: A randomized crossover study.
Dental Traumatology : Official Publication of International Association for Dental Traumatology 2018 November 28
BACKGROUND/AIM: Approximately 50% of water polo players have suffered orofacial injuries. However, fewer than 8% of players wear a mouthguard. A more comfortable mouthguard design is therefore needed to increase compliance. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of reducing the palatal extension of a custom-made mouthguard on the degree of satisfaction with a mouthguard among water polo players.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Eighteen elite water polo players participated in this randomized crossover trial. Two custom-made mouthguards were fabricated for each participant using 4-mm-thick ethyl vinyl acetate foils, defined by the extension of the palatal margin from the cervical line: conventional (6 mm) and shortened (2 mm). The mouthguards were worn during all training sessions and matches, in a randomized sequence (one mouthguard type for the first and fourth weeks and the other for the second and third weeks). Mouthguards were evaluated on 10-point scales for discomfort, interference with oral functions, protection, and general satisfaction after each training session or match.
RESULTS: Players evaluated the shortened mouthguard as having less interference with speech (Effect 1.30; P<0.001), breathing (Effect 0.98; P=0.004), swallowing (Effect 1.30; P<0.001), and athletic performance (Effect 0.61; P=0.03) compared with the conventional mouthguard. The perceived degree of protection was similar among participants when wearing each type of mouthguard. Overall, players were more satisfied with the shortened mouthguard (Effect 0.64; P=0.03).
CONCLUSIONS: Reducing the palatal extension of a custom-made mouthguard from 6 to 2 mm improves the overall satisfaction of elite water polo players without affecting the perceived degree of protection. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Eighteen elite water polo players participated in this randomized crossover trial. Two custom-made mouthguards were fabricated for each participant using 4-mm-thick ethyl vinyl acetate foils, defined by the extension of the palatal margin from the cervical line: conventional (6 mm) and shortened (2 mm). The mouthguards were worn during all training sessions and matches, in a randomized sequence (one mouthguard type for the first and fourth weeks and the other for the second and third weeks). Mouthguards were evaluated on 10-point scales for discomfort, interference with oral functions, protection, and general satisfaction after each training session or match.
RESULTS: Players evaluated the shortened mouthguard as having less interference with speech (Effect 1.30; P<0.001), breathing (Effect 0.98; P=0.004), swallowing (Effect 1.30; P<0.001), and athletic performance (Effect 0.61; P=0.03) compared with the conventional mouthguard. The perceived degree of protection was similar among participants when wearing each type of mouthguard. Overall, players were more satisfied with the shortened mouthguard (Effect 0.64; P=0.03).
CONCLUSIONS: Reducing the palatal extension of a custom-made mouthguard from 6 to 2 mm improves the overall satisfaction of elite water polo players without affecting the perceived degree of protection. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Full text links
Trending Papers
A Personalized Approach to the Management of Congestion in Acute Heart Failure.Heart International 2023
Potential Mechanisms of the Protective Effects of the Cardiometabolic Drugs Type-2 Sodium-Glucose Transporter Inhibitors and Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists in Heart Failure.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 Februrary 21
The Effect of Albumin Administration in Critically Ill Patients: A Retrospective Single-Center Analysis.Critical Care Medicine 2024 Februrary 8
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app