We have located links that may give you full text access.
Post-EVAR aneurysm sac shrinkage is prognostically favorable, but does not justify withholding follow-up.
Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery 2018 November 21
BACKGROUND: One of the main drawbacks of endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) compared to open aortic surgery is the possibility of developing endoleaks and secondary aneurysm rupture, requiring frequent imaging follow-up. This study aims to identify prognostic factors that could be incorporated in follow-up protocols, which might lead to better personalized, lower cost and safe EVAR follow-up.
METHODS: A retrospective study was performed including all patients who underwent elective EVAR from January 2000 to December 2015. Follow-up data were gathered by reviewing medical files for radiographic imaging. Linear and logistic regressions were used to assess predictive factors for aneurysm shrinkage.
RESULTS: In 361 patients, aneurysm sac shrinkage of 10 millimeter or more was measured in 152 (42.1%) patients. Patients with ≥10mm aneurysm shrinkage had fewer endoleaks (4.3% vs 24.6%, p<0.0001) and fewer re-interventions for endoleak (3.0% vs 10.1%, p=0.007). Aneurysm sac shrinkage was correlated with the absence of endoleak development (OR 0.36, 95%CI 0.19-0.66, p=0.001). In patients who had achieved ≥10mm shrinkage of the aneurysm sac, no further significant growth was seen, compared to 38 (15.3%) patients who did not attain size reduction (p<0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Once patients achieve ≥10mm aneurysm sac shrinkage, they are less prone to developing subsequent aneurysm growth and have significantly lower risk of requiring surgery for endoleaks. However, a small number of patients remain at risk of requiring endoleak surgery after aneurysm shrinkage. Therefore, we would not recommend ceasing life-long imaging follow-up after significant aneurysm sac shrinkage, though it might be safe to increase the interval of follow-up.
METHODS: A retrospective study was performed including all patients who underwent elective EVAR from January 2000 to December 2015. Follow-up data were gathered by reviewing medical files for radiographic imaging. Linear and logistic regressions were used to assess predictive factors for aneurysm shrinkage.
RESULTS: In 361 patients, aneurysm sac shrinkage of 10 millimeter or more was measured in 152 (42.1%) patients. Patients with ≥10mm aneurysm shrinkage had fewer endoleaks (4.3% vs 24.6%, p<0.0001) and fewer re-interventions for endoleak (3.0% vs 10.1%, p=0.007). Aneurysm sac shrinkage was correlated with the absence of endoleak development (OR 0.36, 95%CI 0.19-0.66, p=0.001). In patients who had achieved ≥10mm shrinkage of the aneurysm sac, no further significant growth was seen, compared to 38 (15.3%) patients who did not attain size reduction (p<0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Once patients achieve ≥10mm aneurysm sac shrinkage, they are less prone to developing subsequent aneurysm growth and have significantly lower risk of requiring surgery for endoleaks. However, a small number of patients remain at risk of requiring endoleak surgery after aneurysm shrinkage. Therefore, we would not recommend ceasing life-long imaging follow-up after significant aneurysm sac shrinkage, though it might be safe to increase the interval of follow-up.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app