We have located links that may give you full text access.
Treatment of Cutaneous Lichen Planus (Part 2): A Review of Systemic Therapies.
Journal of Dermatological Treatment 2018 November 18
BACKGROUND: Although numerous medications are available for the treatment of cutaneous lichen planus (CLP), recurrence is common and there is a lack of evidence of efficacy of many treatment options. Part 1 reviewed consolidated evidence from topical therapies and phototherapy. In Part 2, all systemic treatments are assessed.
METHODS: All English studies, regardless of design, investigating the outcome of systemic treatment for CLP, until January 2018, were included. While there were only a few well designed randomised control trials (RCTs), evidence was extrapolated and graded from open trials, case series as well as case reports.
RESULTS: Mini pulse therapy with corticosteroids should be considered over moderate daily dosing with retinoids being an alternative option. Low dose methotrexate is considered effective and safe provided it is regularly monitored. Azathioprine, cyclosporine and mycophenolate mofetil require larger more defined RCTs in resistant CLP. Low-molecular-weight heparins may be considered in patients with no response to first-line treatment. Biologics are potentially promising but there is a need for RCTs with a considerable duration to determine their long-term safety profiles. Evidence with various other drugs were reported.
CONCLUSION: Clinicians may have a broader perspective on the efficacy of treatments across all study profiles.
METHODS: All English studies, regardless of design, investigating the outcome of systemic treatment for CLP, until January 2018, were included. While there were only a few well designed randomised control trials (RCTs), evidence was extrapolated and graded from open trials, case series as well as case reports.
RESULTS: Mini pulse therapy with corticosteroids should be considered over moderate daily dosing with retinoids being an alternative option. Low dose methotrexate is considered effective and safe provided it is regularly monitored. Azathioprine, cyclosporine and mycophenolate mofetil require larger more defined RCTs in resistant CLP. Low-molecular-weight heparins may be considered in patients with no response to first-line treatment. Biologics are potentially promising but there is a need for RCTs with a considerable duration to determine their long-term safety profiles. Evidence with various other drugs were reported.
CONCLUSION: Clinicians may have a broader perspective on the efficacy of treatments across all study profiles.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app