We have located links that may give you full text access.
Learning curve for the ultrasonographic diagnosis of deep endometriosis using a structured off-line training program.
Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology 2018 November 14
OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to assess the learning curves of trainees during a structured off-line/hands-on training program on the diagnosis of deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE).
METHODS: A two-week training program was conducted. One day was devoted to theoretical issues and guided off-line analysis of 10 volumes of three-dimensional (3D) ultrasound. During the following days, five sessions of real-time sonographic examinations were performed in a DIE referral center Ultrasound unit. In between sessions, the trainees analyzed four off-line sets, containing twenty-five 3D volumes each. At the end of each set, misinterpreted volumes were assessed with the trainer. One trainer and 4 trainees (all post-graduated Ob/Gyn with at least 5 years of experience in ultrasonography in Obstetrics and Gynecology but with no experience in DIE sonographic examinations) participated in the study. Presence or absence of DIE at surgery was considered as gold standard for the trainees. Trainee's results were evaluated by learning curve cumulative summation (LC-CUSUM) and the deviations of the level of trainees' performance at the control stage by CUSUM (standard CUSUM) for different locations of DIE.
RESULTS: The trainees reached competence on average after 17 evaluations (range 21-14) for bladder locations, after 39 evaluations (range 60-30) for rectosigmoid locations, after 25 evaluations (range 34-14) for forniceal locations, after 44 evaluations (range 66-25) for utero-sacral locations (USL), after 21 evaluations (range 43-14) for rectovaginal septum (RVS) locations respectively, and kept the process under control with error levels of less than 4.5% until the end of the test. The overall accuracy for each trainee at the different locations ranged from 0.91 to 0.96 for bladder DIE, from 0.80 to 0.94 for recto-sigmoid DIE, from 0.90 to 0.94% for forniceal DIE, from 0.79 to 0.82 for utero-sacral ligaments DIE and from 0.89 to 0.97 for recto-vaginal septum DIE.
CONCLUSIONS: The suggested two-weeks learning program based on a mix of off-line and live sessions is feasible and suggests a good performance in training for the diagnosis of DIE. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
METHODS: A two-week training program was conducted. One day was devoted to theoretical issues and guided off-line analysis of 10 volumes of three-dimensional (3D) ultrasound. During the following days, five sessions of real-time sonographic examinations were performed in a DIE referral center Ultrasound unit. In between sessions, the trainees analyzed four off-line sets, containing twenty-five 3D volumes each. At the end of each set, misinterpreted volumes were assessed with the trainer. One trainer and 4 trainees (all post-graduated Ob/Gyn with at least 5 years of experience in ultrasonography in Obstetrics and Gynecology but with no experience in DIE sonographic examinations) participated in the study. Presence or absence of DIE at surgery was considered as gold standard for the trainees. Trainee's results were evaluated by learning curve cumulative summation (LC-CUSUM) and the deviations of the level of trainees' performance at the control stage by CUSUM (standard CUSUM) for different locations of DIE.
RESULTS: The trainees reached competence on average after 17 evaluations (range 21-14) for bladder locations, after 39 evaluations (range 60-30) for rectosigmoid locations, after 25 evaluations (range 34-14) for forniceal locations, after 44 evaluations (range 66-25) for utero-sacral locations (USL), after 21 evaluations (range 43-14) for rectovaginal septum (RVS) locations respectively, and kept the process under control with error levels of less than 4.5% until the end of the test. The overall accuracy for each trainee at the different locations ranged from 0.91 to 0.96 for bladder DIE, from 0.80 to 0.94 for recto-sigmoid DIE, from 0.90 to 0.94% for forniceal DIE, from 0.79 to 0.82 for utero-sacral ligaments DIE and from 0.89 to 0.97 for recto-vaginal septum DIE.
CONCLUSIONS: The suggested two-weeks learning program based on a mix of off-line and live sessions is feasible and suggests a good performance in training for the diagnosis of DIE. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Diagnosis and Management of Cardiac Sarcoidosis: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.Circulation 2024 April 19
Essential thrombocythaemia: A contemporary approach with new drugs on the horizon.British Journal of Haematology 2024 April 9
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app