Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

The epidemiology of autologous tissue grafting in primary and revision rhinoplasty.

Laryngoscope 2018 November 9
OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: To determine the percentage of primary versus revision rhinoplasty cases that require an extranasal source of grafting, as well as age and gender-specific trends.

STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional analysis of multistate ambulatory surgery and hospital databases.

METHODS: Ambulatory rhinoplasty procedures were extracted from the State Ambulatory Surgery Databases for New York, Kentucky, North Carolina, Michigan, and Florida for 2014 to 2015. Cases were examined for simultaneous use of extranasal grafts.

RESULTS: A total of 8,510 rhinoplasties were extracted (65.3% female, mean age = 35.6 years), and 11.9% were revision cases (95% confidence interval [CI]: 11.2-12.6). An extranasal, autologous source of grafting was required in 12.7% of cases (5.3% auricular, 95% CI: 4%-6.6%; 1.8% costal, 95% CI: 1%-2.6%). Revision cases were more likely to require a secondary source of grafting (24.4%, 95% CI: 21.8%-27.1% vs. 11.1%, 95% CI: 10.3%-11.8%). In revision cases, the most common graft was auricular cartilage (14.4%, 95% CI: 12.2%-16.6%) followed by costal (7.1%, 95% CI: 5.52%-8.69%). Only 1.1% of primary cases required costal cartilage (95% CI: 0.88%-1.36%) compared to 7.1% of revision cases (95% CI: 5.52%-8.69%). Of the primary cases, 4.1% required auricular cartilage grafting (95% CI: 3.67%-4.57%) compared to 14.4% of revision cases (95% CI: 12.2%-16.6%). Patients who required a graft were older. Significantly more males required autologous grafting than females (P = .047).

CONCLUSIONS: Cartilaginous or bony grafting is a critical surgical technique in both primary and secondary rhinoplasties. This is the first study to examine percentages of site-specific autologous grafting from auricular and costal donor sites for primary and revision cases. Gender and age-specific trends associated with specific grafting sites are also identified. These data are important to help guide preoperative counseling and informed consent for all rhinoplasty surgeries.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: NA Laryngoscope, 2018.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app