We have located links that may give you full text access.
Evaluation of the Vitek-MS™ system in the identification of Candida isolates from bloodstream infections.
Revista Iberoamericana de Micología 2018 July
BACKGROUND: Matrix-assisted laser desorption-time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF-MS) represents a revolution in the identification of microorganisms of clinical interest. Many studies have confirmed the accuracy and fastness of this tool with routine strains.
AIMS: To identify clinical isolates of Candida from patients diagnosed with candidemia.
METHODS: Vitek-MS™ system was used with a collection of 298 blood isolates of the genus Candida represented by 9 different species. Sequencing of the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region of ribosomal DNA cluster was used as the reference method.
RESULTS: The results of Vitek-MS™ were concordant with those obtained with the reference method for 279 (93.62%) isolates (Kappa coefficient (κ)=0.91). Vitek-MS™ misidentified 10 (3.36%) isolates and did not identify 9 (3.02%) isolates.
CONCLUSIONS: This study determines the potential of Vitek-MS™ in yeast identification, being a reliable and fast alternative in the clinical laboratory, with an acceptable sensitivity of 82% (IC 95%: 70-90.6%), in comparison with a 100% (IC 95%: 92.9-100%) sensitivity of the conventional methods.
AIMS: To identify clinical isolates of Candida from patients diagnosed with candidemia.
METHODS: Vitek-MS™ system was used with a collection of 298 blood isolates of the genus Candida represented by 9 different species. Sequencing of the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region of ribosomal DNA cluster was used as the reference method.
RESULTS: The results of Vitek-MS™ were concordant with those obtained with the reference method for 279 (93.62%) isolates (Kappa coefficient (κ)=0.91). Vitek-MS™ misidentified 10 (3.36%) isolates and did not identify 9 (3.02%) isolates.
CONCLUSIONS: This study determines the potential of Vitek-MS™ in yeast identification, being a reliable and fast alternative in the clinical laboratory, with an acceptable sensitivity of 82% (IC 95%: 70-90.6%), in comparison with a 100% (IC 95%: 92.9-100%) sensitivity of the conventional methods.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app