We have located links that may give you full text access.
Remote ischemic preconditioning in the management of intermittent claudication: a pilot randomized controlled trial.
Annals of Vascular Surgery 2018 September 30
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate Remote ischaemic preconditioning in management of intermittent claudication patients BACKGROUND: Animal data suggest that remote ischaemic conditioning (RIC) can improve blood flow in ischaemic limbs and, consequently, may benefit claudication patients Supervised exercise is the preferred first-line intervention for patients with intermittent claudication (IC) but is constrained by limited availability and logistical issues, particularly in rural settings METHODS: We undertook a randomised clinical trial to evaluate RIC's effect in claudication patients. Stable IC patients were randomly allocated to receive RIC alone, structured resistance exercise (SE) alone, RIC plus SE or to a control group which received standard advice and risk factor modification. Patients received their intervention over a 28-day period. RIC patients attended an RIC clinic every 3 to 4 days to undergo 4 cycles of 5 minutes upper limb ischaemia followed by 5 minutes reperfusion induced with a standard blood pressure cuff.
RESULTS: 45 patients were randomised, of whom 40 completed the trial (10 patients per group). The RIC alone, SE alone and RIC plus SE groups all demonstrated significant improvements in pain-free walking distance and ankle-brachial pressure indices at 30 days. There were no differences in the magnitude of improvements between the groups.
CONCLUSION: Compare with standard care RIC is promising as a home-delivered intervention. It appears to be equivalent to SE in the treatment of IC. with no apparent additive benefit to combining the two interventions in this small size sample. large scale RCT is needed for validation.
RESULTS: 45 patients were randomised, of whom 40 completed the trial (10 patients per group). The RIC alone, SE alone and RIC plus SE groups all demonstrated significant improvements in pain-free walking distance and ankle-brachial pressure indices at 30 days. There were no differences in the magnitude of improvements between the groups.
CONCLUSION: Compare with standard care RIC is promising as a home-delivered intervention. It appears to be equivalent to SE in the treatment of IC. with no apparent additive benefit to combining the two interventions in this small size sample. large scale RCT is needed for validation.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment.Clinical Research in Cardiology : Official Journal of the German Cardiac Society 2024 April 12
Proximal versus distal diuretics in congestive heart failure.Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2024 Februrary 30
Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy in chronic insomnia: A review of clinical guidelines and case reports.Mental Health Clinician 2023 October
World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification of eosinophilic disorders: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.American Journal of Hematology 2024 March 30
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app