We have located links that may give you full text access.
Prevalence and Types of Aortic Arch Variants and Anomalies in Congenital Heart Diseases.
Academic Radiology 2019 July
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: Aortic arch (AA) variants and anomalies are important to recognize in patients with congenital heart disease (CHD) before surgery or intervention. The aim was to study the prevalence of AA anomalies and variants in patients with CHD compared to a control group. The secondary outcome was to report the associations between common variations of AA and specific types of CHD.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: After institutional review board approval, computed tomography studies of 352 CHD patients and control group of 400 consecutive computed tomography scans of the thorax were evaluated. The AA was assigned to one of seven common types, and their distribution was compared between CHD and control. The distribution of the AA anomalies and variants was evaluated as regard specific types of CHD and the visceroatrial situs.
RESULTS: Normal three-vessel branching pattern was the commonest in both groups, but was present in only 50.5% in the CHD compared to 68.5% in the control group, p < 0.00001. Right AA and aberrant right subclavian artery were significantly more common in CHD than control group (18.1% versus 0.25%, p < 0.00001) and (4.5% versus 0.25%, p = 0.0001), respectively. Direct aortic origin of left vertebral artery was insignificantly more common in CHD group (4.2% versus 2.7%, p = 0.258). Brachiobicephalic trunk was significantly more common in control than CHD group (27.7% versus 19.3%, p = 0.007).
CONCLUSION: Normal three-vessel AA was significantly less common in CHD. AA anomalies (right arch and aberrant right subclavian) were more common in CHD than control, while AA variants (brachiobicephalic trunk and direct aortic origin of left vertebral artery) were not.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: After institutional review board approval, computed tomography studies of 352 CHD patients and control group of 400 consecutive computed tomography scans of the thorax were evaluated. The AA was assigned to one of seven common types, and their distribution was compared between CHD and control. The distribution of the AA anomalies and variants was evaluated as regard specific types of CHD and the visceroatrial situs.
RESULTS: Normal three-vessel branching pattern was the commonest in both groups, but was present in only 50.5% in the CHD compared to 68.5% in the control group, p < 0.00001. Right AA and aberrant right subclavian artery were significantly more common in CHD than control group (18.1% versus 0.25%, p < 0.00001) and (4.5% versus 0.25%, p = 0.0001), respectively. Direct aortic origin of left vertebral artery was insignificantly more common in CHD group (4.2% versus 2.7%, p = 0.258). Brachiobicephalic trunk was significantly more common in control than CHD group (27.7% versus 19.3%, p = 0.007).
CONCLUSION: Normal three-vessel AA was significantly less common in CHD. AA anomalies (right arch and aberrant right subclavian) were more common in CHD than control, while AA variants (brachiobicephalic trunk and direct aortic origin of left vertebral artery) were not.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment.Clinical Research in Cardiology : Official Journal of the German Cardiac Society 2024 April 12
Proximal versus distal diuretics in congestive heart failure.Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2024 Februrary 30
World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification of eosinophilic disorders: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.American Journal of Hematology 2024 March 30
Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy in chronic insomnia: A review of clinical guidelines and case reports.Mental Health Clinician 2023 October
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app