We have located links that may give you full text access.
How to Handle Lymphadenectomy Specimens to Identify Metastasis More Accurately in Gynecologic Pathology.
AIM: To identify the value of processing multiple sections to detect metastasis in lymph nodes (LNs) dissected during gynecologic cancer surgery, and to evaluate the sizes of metastatic LNs in each region to compare with the largest one.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included 362 patients who had gynecologic cancer with at least one metastatic LN. Slides of 627 metastatic LN specimens were categorized according to the processing technique into single and more than one section (MOS) groups. In the MOS group, the LNs were cut into 2 or 3 parallel slices because their greatest dimensions exceeded 0.5 cm. Sizes of LN metastatic foci (MF) were measured and defined as follows: MF ⩽2 mm as micrometastasis and MF >2 mm as macrometastasis. The largest LN diameters among the metastatic LNs and the largest LNs in those regions were measured. Groups were compared using the Kruskal-Wallis test.
RESULTS: Sixty-five (10.3%) of the metastatic LNs included in this study had micrometastases and 40 (6.3%) of them had MF ⩽1 mm. The rate of micrometastasis was higher in the MOS group than in the single-section group (11.8% vs 8.5%, respectively). Twenty-eight percent (n = 175) of metastatic LNs were not the largest, and 55.5% of those were less than 1 cm in diameter.
CONCLUSION: Methods of LN processing and macroscopic evaluation are not standardized, and processing single sections from LNs may overlook micrometastases. The detection rate of micrometastases can be improved by processing multiple sections from LNs.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included 362 patients who had gynecologic cancer with at least one metastatic LN. Slides of 627 metastatic LN specimens were categorized according to the processing technique into single and more than one section (MOS) groups. In the MOS group, the LNs were cut into 2 or 3 parallel slices because their greatest dimensions exceeded 0.5 cm. Sizes of LN metastatic foci (MF) were measured and defined as follows: MF ⩽2 mm as micrometastasis and MF >2 mm as macrometastasis. The largest LN diameters among the metastatic LNs and the largest LNs in those regions were measured. Groups were compared using the Kruskal-Wallis test.
RESULTS: Sixty-five (10.3%) of the metastatic LNs included in this study had micrometastases and 40 (6.3%) of them had MF ⩽1 mm. The rate of micrometastasis was higher in the MOS group than in the single-section group (11.8% vs 8.5%, respectively). Twenty-eight percent (n = 175) of metastatic LNs were not the largest, and 55.5% of those were less than 1 cm in diameter.
CONCLUSION: Methods of LN processing and macroscopic evaluation are not standardized, and processing single sections from LNs may overlook micrometastases. The detection rate of micrometastases can be improved by processing multiple sections from LNs.
Full text links
Trending Papers
A Personalized Approach to the Management of Congestion in Acute Heart Failure.Heart International 2023
Potential Mechanisms of the Protective Effects of the Cardiometabolic Drugs Type-2 Sodium-Glucose Transporter Inhibitors and Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists in Heart Failure.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 Februrary 21
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app