We have located links that may give you full text access.
JOURNAL ARTICLE
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL
Effects of a new device for automated closed loop control of inspired oxygen concentration on fluctuations of arterial and different regional organ tissue oxygen saturations in preterm infants.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of a newly developed system for closed loop control of the fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2 ) on variation of arterial (SpO2 ) and on regional tissue oxygen saturation (StO2 ) in preterm infants with fluctuations in SpO2 .
DESIGN: Randomised crossover trial comparing automated (auto) to manual FiO2 adjustment (manual) during two consecutive 24 hours periods using a Sophie infant ventilator (SPO2 C).
SETTING: Tertiary university medical centre.
PATIENTS: Twelve very low birthweight infant (VLBWI) (gestational age (median; IQR): (25; 23-26 weeks); birth weight (mean±SD): (667±134 g); postnatal age (mean±SD): (31.5±14 days)).
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Time within SpO2 target range.
RESULTS: There was an increase in time within the intended SpO2 target range (88%-96%) during auto as compared with manual mode (77.8%±7.1% vs 68.5%±7.7% (mean±SD), p<0.001) and a decrease in time below the SpO2 target during the auto period (18.1%±6.4% vs 25.6%±7.6%; p<0.01). There was a dramatic reduction in events with an SpO2 <88% with >180 s duration: (2 (0-10) vs 10 (0-37) events, p<0.001) and the need for manual adjustments. The time the infants spent above the intended arterial oxygen range (4.1%±3.8% vs 5.9%±3.6%), median FiO2 , mean SpO2 over time and StO2 in the brain, liver and kidney did not differ significantly between the two periods.
CONCLUSIONS: Closed-loop FiO2 using SPO2 C significantly increased time of arterial SpO2 within the intended range in VLBWI and decreased the need for manual adjustments when compared with the routine adjustment by staff members. StO2 was not significantly affected by the mode of oxygen control.
DESIGN: Randomised crossover trial comparing automated (auto) to manual FiO2 adjustment (manual) during two consecutive 24 hours periods using a Sophie infant ventilator (SPO2 C).
SETTING: Tertiary university medical centre.
PATIENTS: Twelve very low birthweight infant (VLBWI) (gestational age (median; IQR): (25; 23-26 weeks); birth weight (mean±SD): (667±134 g); postnatal age (mean±SD): (31.5±14 days)).
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Time within SpO2 target range.
RESULTS: There was an increase in time within the intended SpO2 target range (88%-96%) during auto as compared with manual mode (77.8%±7.1% vs 68.5%±7.7% (mean±SD), p<0.001) and a decrease in time below the SpO2 target during the auto period (18.1%±6.4% vs 25.6%±7.6%; p<0.01). There was a dramatic reduction in events with an SpO2 <88% with >180 s duration: (2 (0-10) vs 10 (0-37) events, p<0.001) and the need for manual adjustments. The time the infants spent above the intended arterial oxygen range (4.1%±3.8% vs 5.9%±3.6%), median FiO2 , mean SpO2 over time and StO2 in the brain, liver and kidney did not differ significantly between the two periods.
CONCLUSIONS: Closed-loop FiO2 using SPO2 C significantly increased time of arterial SpO2 within the intended range in VLBWI and decreased the need for manual adjustments when compared with the routine adjustment by staff members. StO2 was not significantly affected by the mode of oxygen control.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment.Clinical Research in Cardiology : Official Journal of the German Cardiac Society 2024 April 12
Proximal versus distal diuretics in congestive heart failure.Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2024 Februrary 30
Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy in chronic insomnia: A review of clinical guidelines and case reports.Mental Health Clinician 2023 October
World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification of eosinophilic disorders: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.American Journal of Hematology 2024 March 30
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app