Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Breast cancers with HER2/CEP17 ratio ≥ 2.0 and an average HER2 copy number <4.0 per cell: frequency, Immunohistochemical correlation, and Clinicopathologic features.

Human Pathology 2018 August 17
The 2013 American Society of Clinical Oncology and College of American Pathologists (ASCO/CAP) guidelines classified breast cancers with a florescence in situ hybridization (FISH) dual probe HER2/CEP17 ratio ≥ 2 as "amplified", inclusive of cases with a HER2 copy number< 4. The 2018 ASCO/CAP update assigns HER2/neu status for the latter group in a fashion that is highly dependent on the associated immunohistochemical findings. Herein, the authors define the frequency, immunohistochemical correlates, and other clinicopathologic features of breast cancers with HER2/CEP17 ratio ≥ 2 and HER2/neu copy number< 4 (group-A), based on an analysis of an institutional cohort assessed for HER2/neu status by both FISH and immunohistochemistry and scored using 2013 ASCO/CAP criteria. Group-A cases were compared to a group-B of HER2/neu-amplified breast cancers with a HER2/neu copy number ≥ 4 regarding a variety of clinicopathologic features. 169 (14%) of 1201 cases were HER2/neu-amplified, 18 (10.7%) in group-A and 151 (89.3%) in group-B. By immunohistochemistry, 61.1% of group-A cases were HER2/neu-negative, 7 (38.9%) were equivocal and none were positive. In contrast, 66.9% of group-B cases were HER2-positive (3+). We could not demonstrate statistically significant differences between the 2 groups regarding standard clinicopathologic variables. In summary, our group-A cases account for 1.5% of breast cancers, and 10.7% of all HER2/neu-amplified cancers classified as such based on 2013 ASCO/CAP criteria. They are predominantly HER2/neu-negative by immunohistochemistry, which suggests that they are biologically different from classically HER2/neu-amplified cases, and which validates the 2018 ASCO/CAP guideline against automatically classifying such cases as HER2/neu-amplified.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app