We have located links that may give you full text access.
Antibacterial Effects of Chitosan, Formocresol and CMCP as Pulpectomy Medicament on Enterococcus faecalis , Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus mutans .
Introduction: During pulpectomy of primary teeth, cytotoxic medicaments such as formocresol or camphor mono-chlorophenol (CMCP) are used as medicaments. For the first time it is theorized that chitosan can substitute these traditional materials used in pulpectomy of infectious primary teeth.
Methods and Materials: This preliminary in vitro study consisted of two separate phases ( n =75), each of which assessed the antibacterial effects of chitosan versus formocresol and CMCP and positive/negative controls ( n =15) on three bacteria types [ Enterococcus faecalis, Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus mutans , ( n =5 per subgroup)]. Phases 1 and 2 concerned respectively with 1- and 7-day effects of these materials. Bacteria were cultured and injected into sterilized canals and colonies were counted. Medicaments were applied and colonies were re-counted after 1 day of treatment (phase 1). Specimens were re-sterilized and re-randomized, and used for phase 2, in which the same procedures were performed for a 7-day period. Effects of agents on bacteria were analyzed statistically (Kruskal-Wallis α =0.05 and Mann-Whitney α =0.017).
Results: Treatments reduced bacterial count either after 1 or 7 days ( P =0.000). Their effects on different bacteria types were not significant either after 1 or 7 days ( P >0.48). Antibacterial efficacies of treatments (indicated by colony reduction) were significantly different, after 7 days ( P =0.045). Antibacterial efficacy of chitosan was similar to that of formocresol or CMCP, in both phases [either after 1 or 7 days of treatment ( P >0.017). Formocresol and CMCP had similar efficacies in either phase ( P >0.017).
Conclusions: This preliminary study confirmed the appropriate antibacterial efficacy of chitosan as a medicament in pulpectomy of infectious primary teeth.
Methods and Materials: This preliminary in vitro study consisted of two separate phases ( n =75), each of which assessed the antibacterial effects of chitosan versus formocresol and CMCP and positive/negative controls ( n =15) on three bacteria types [ Enterococcus faecalis, Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus mutans , ( n =5 per subgroup)]. Phases 1 and 2 concerned respectively with 1- and 7-day effects of these materials. Bacteria were cultured and injected into sterilized canals and colonies were counted. Medicaments were applied and colonies were re-counted after 1 day of treatment (phase 1). Specimens were re-sterilized and re-randomized, and used for phase 2, in which the same procedures were performed for a 7-day period. Effects of agents on bacteria were analyzed statistically (Kruskal-Wallis α =0.05 and Mann-Whitney α =0.017).
Results: Treatments reduced bacterial count either after 1 or 7 days ( P =0.000). Their effects on different bacteria types were not significant either after 1 or 7 days ( P >0.48). Antibacterial efficacies of treatments (indicated by colony reduction) were significantly different, after 7 days ( P =0.045). Antibacterial efficacy of chitosan was similar to that of formocresol or CMCP, in both phases [either after 1 or 7 days of treatment ( P >0.017). Formocresol and CMCP had similar efficacies in either phase ( P >0.017).
Conclusions: This preliminary study confirmed the appropriate antibacterial efficacy of chitosan as a medicament in pulpectomy of infectious primary teeth.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app