We have located links that may give you full text access.
Surgical outcome of a new modification to muscle belly union surgery in heavy eye syndrome.
Strabismus 2018 December
OBJECTIVES: To report the clinical outcomes of a new modification to muscle belly union surgery in heavy eye syndrome.
METHODS: Muscle belly union was performed in patients with large-angle esotropia and characteristic findings of heavy eye syndrome on orbital imaging. After isolation of superior and lateral rectus muscle and passing a single armed suture in each muscle belly, approximation was achieved via tying of both arms of separate sutures together. Medial rectus (MR) was also recessed considering the results of the intraoperative force duction test.
RESULTS: Surgery was conducted in 24 eyes of 16 patients. The mean preoperative esotropia was 93.71 ± 23.1 prism diopters (PD), which improved significantly after the operation (final esotropia: 11.53 ± 15.59 PD, P value = 0.001). Six patients also exhibited mild hypotropia preoperatively (9.33 ± 6.88 PD), which resolved completely after surgery in all cases. Evaluation of preoperative abduction limitation (minus 3.1 ± 1.83) showed a significant improvement postoperatively (minus 0.95 ± 0.68, P value = 0.000). Additionally, mild limitation of adduction (minus 1) was seen in nine patients due to large MR recession. However, none of the patients reported postoperative diplopia.
CONCLUSION: Our new approach in muscle belly union surgery resulted in favorable outcomes compared with previous studies. It seems that the two-suture technique presented in this study yields more convenient approximation of muscle bellies and acts as a safety suture upon spontaneous loosening of the first applied suture.
METHODS: Muscle belly union was performed in patients with large-angle esotropia and characteristic findings of heavy eye syndrome on orbital imaging. After isolation of superior and lateral rectus muscle and passing a single armed suture in each muscle belly, approximation was achieved via tying of both arms of separate sutures together. Medial rectus (MR) was also recessed considering the results of the intraoperative force duction test.
RESULTS: Surgery was conducted in 24 eyes of 16 patients. The mean preoperative esotropia was 93.71 ± 23.1 prism diopters (PD), which improved significantly after the operation (final esotropia: 11.53 ± 15.59 PD, P value = 0.001). Six patients also exhibited mild hypotropia preoperatively (9.33 ± 6.88 PD), which resolved completely after surgery in all cases. Evaluation of preoperative abduction limitation (minus 3.1 ± 1.83) showed a significant improvement postoperatively (minus 0.95 ± 0.68, P value = 0.000). Additionally, mild limitation of adduction (minus 1) was seen in nine patients due to large MR recession. However, none of the patients reported postoperative diplopia.
CONCLUSION: Our new approach in muscle belly union surgery resulted in favorable outcomes compared with previous studies. It seems that the two-suture technique presented in this study yields more convenient approximation of muscle bellies and acts as a safety suture upon spontaneous loosening of the first applied suture.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment.Clinical Research in Cardiology : Official Journal of the German Cardiac Society 2024 April 12
Proximal versus distal diuretics in congestive heart failure.Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2024 Februrary 30
Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy in chronic insomnia: A review of clinical guidelines and case reports.Mental Health Clinician 2023 October
World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification of eosinophilic disorders: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.American Journal of Hematology 2024 March 30
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app