Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Assessment of brain beta-amyloid deposition in transgenic mouse models of Alzheimer's disease with PET imaging agents 18 F-flutemetamol and 18 F-florbetaben.

BMC Neuroscience 2018 July 28
BACKGROUND: Although amyloid beta (Aβ) imaging is widely used for diagnosing and monitoring Alzheimer's disease in clinical fields, paralleling comparison between 18 F-flutemetamol and 18 F-florbetaben was rarely attempted in AD mouse model. We performed a comparison of Aβ PET images between 18 F-flutemetamol and 18 F-florbetaben in a recently developed APPswe mouse model, C57BL/6-Tg (NSE-hAPPsw) Korl.

RESULTS: After an injection (0.23 mCi) of 18 F-flutemetamol and 18 F-florbetaben at a time interval of 2-3 days, we compared group difference of SUVR and kinetic parameters between the AD (n = 7) and control (n = 7) mice, as well as between 18 F-flutemetamol and 18 F-florbetaben image. In addition, bio-distribution and histopathology were conducted. With visual image and VOI-based SUVR analysis, the AD group presented more prominent uptake than did the control group in both the 18 F-florbetaben and 18 F-flutemetamol images. With kinetic analysis, the 18 F-florbetaben images showed differences in K1 and k4 between the AD and control groups, although 18 F-flutemetamol images did not show significant difference. 18 F-florbetaben images showed more prominent cortical uptake and matched well to the thioflavin S staining images than did the 18 F-flutemetamol image. In contrast, 18 F-flutemetamol images presented higher K1, k4, K1/k2 values than those of 18 F-florbetaben images. Also, 18 F-flutemetamol images presented prominent uptake in the bowel and bladder, consistent with higher bio-distribution in kidney, lung, blood and heart.

CONCLUSIONS: Compared with 18 F-flutemetamol images, 18 F-florbetaben images showed prominent visual uptake intensity, SUVR, and higher correlations with the pathology. In contrast, 18 F-flutemetamol was more actively metabolized than was 18 F-florbetaben (Son et al. in J Nucl Med 58(Suppl 1):S278, 2017].

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app