Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

The Italian Version of the Brief 21-Item Prodromal Questionnaire: Field Test, Psychometric Properties and Age-Sensitive Cut-Offs.

BACKGROUND: The Brief, 21-item version of the Prodromal Questionnaire (PQ-B) is a promising screener for psychosis-risk states that could be implemented in routine clinical practice. In this study, we assessed psychometric properties of the Italian version of the PQ-B (iPQ-B) in a sample of 243 help-seekers, aged 13-35 years.

SAMPLING AND METHODS: After completing the iPQ-B, participants were assessed with the Comprehensive Assessment of At-Risk Mental States (CAARMS). Diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values [PPV and NPV], positive and negative likelihood ratios) and concurrent validity between PQ-B and CAARMS were determined using Cronbach's alpha and Cohen's kappa. We also tested the validity of the adopted PQ-B cut-offs through Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves plotted against CAARMS diagnoses and the predictive validity of the iPQ-B at 1-year follow-up.

RESULTS: The iPQ-B showed high internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.868), acceptable diagnostic accuracy and concurrent validity (70% sensitivity, 67% specificity, 81% PPV, Cohen's kappa = 0.335). ROC analyses pointed to threshold of ≥20 on the PQ-B total distress score as best cut-off. After 12 months of follow-up, 11% of participants who scored ≥4 on the PQ-B distressing item total score and did not meet CAARMS psychosis criteria at baseline, developed a psychotic disorder. Interestingly, age had significant negative correlations with iPQ-B scores and adolescents (aged < 18 years) showed higher iPQ-B scores than young adults.

CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the psychometric properties of the iPQ-B were satisfactory. As iPQ-B scores appeared inversely associated to age, age-tailored cut-off scores are recommended for screening purposes in child-adolescent cohorts.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app