We have located links that may give you full text access.
Preclinical assessment of safety and efficacy of intravenous delivery of autologous adipose-derived regenerative cells (ADRCs) in the treatment of severe thermal burns using a porcine model.
Burns 2018 September
OBJECTIVE: A number of studies have reported that application of autologous adipose-derived cell populations leads to improved outcome in different preclinical models of thermal burn injury. However, these studies were limited to assessment of relatively small injuries amounting to only ∼2% of total body surface area (TBSA) in which the complications associated with large burns (e.g.: systemic inflammation and the need for fluid resuscitation) are absent. In anticipation of translating this approach to a clinical trial in which these complications would be present we applied a preclinical model that more closely resembles a patient with large thermal burn injury requiring skin grafting. Thus, the present study used a porcine model to investigate safety and efficacy of intravenous delivery of ADRCs in the treatment of a complex burn injury comprising ∼20% TBSA and including both moderately deep (44%) partial and full thickness burns, and the injury associated with skin graft harvest.
METHODS: Two pairs of full thickness and partial thickness burns involving in total ∼20% TBSA were created on the back of Yorkshire pigs (n=15). Three days post-burn, full thickness wounds were excised and grafted with a 3:1 meshed autologous split thickness skin graft (STSG). Partial thickness wounds were not treated other than with dressings. Animals were then randomized to receive intravenous delivery of ADRCs (n=8) or vehicle control (n=7). Safety was assessed by monitoring systemic parameters (blood gases, hematology, and clinical chemistry) throughout the course of the study. Wound healing for both types of burn wound and for the skin graft donor sites was followed for 18days using wound imaging, histology, and trans-epidermal water loss (TEWL; skin barrier function assessment).
RESULTS: No serious adverse events related to ADRC infusion were noted in any of the animals. Delivery of ADRCs appeared to be safe with none of the systemic safety parameters worsened compared to the control group. TEWL and histological analyses revealed that ADRC treatment was associated with significantly accelerated healing of skin graft (27.1% vs. 1.1% on Day 5 post-grafting), donor site (52.8% vs. 33.1% on Day 5 post-excision) and partial thickness burn (81.8% vs. 59.8% on Day 18 post-treatment). Data also suggested that ADRC treatment improved parameters associated with skin graft elasticity.
CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that intravenous delivery of autologous ADRCs appears to be a safe and feasible approach to the treatment of large burns and supports the use of ADRCs as an adjunct therapy to skin grafting in patients with severe burns.
METHODS: Two pairs of full thickness and partial thickness burns involving in total ∼20% TBSA were created on the back of Yorkshire pigs (n=15). Three days post-burn, full thickness wounds were excised and grafted with a 3:1 meshed autologous split thickness skin graft (STSG). Partial thickness wounds were not treated other than with dressings. Animals were then randomized to receive intravenous delivery of ADRCs (n=8) or vehicle control (n=7). Safety was assessed by monitoring systemic parameters (blood gases, hematology, and clinical chemistry) throughout the course of the study. Wound healing for both types of burn wound and for the skin graft donor sites was followed for 18days using wound imaging, histology, and trans-epidermal water loss (TEWL; skin barrier function assessment).
RESULTS: No serious adverse events related to ADRC infusion were noted in any of the animals. Delivery of ADRCs appeared to be safe with none of the systemic safety parameters worsened compared to the control group. TEWL and histological analyses revealed that ADRC treatment was associated with significantly accelerated healing of skin graft (27.1% vs. 1.1% on Day 5 post-grafting), donor site (52.8% vs. 33.1% on Day 5 post-excision) and partial thickness burn (81.8% vs. 59.8% on Day 18 post-treatment). Data also suggested that ADRC treatment improved parameters associated with skin graft elasticity.
CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that intravenous delivery of autologous ADRCs appears to be a safe and feasible approach to the treatment of large burns and supports the use of ADRCs as an adjunct therapy to skin grafting in patients with severe burns.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
Perioperative echocardiographic strain analysis: what anesthesiologists should know.Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia 2024 April 11
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app