We have located links that may give you full text access.
Software toolbox for analysis of the endometrial myometrial junction - a pilot study.
PURPOSE: To develop and evaluate an algorithm for computerized evaluation and measurement of the endometrial-myometrial junction (EMJ).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The advanced image processing toolbox of the Matlab software package was used for identificiation and quantitative analysis of the EMJ area on three-dimensional (3D) rendered coronal plane uterine images, with clear-cut borders of the EMJ. The algorithm was used to process the images and calculate the geometric parameters characterizing the identified EM The manual measurements of the maximum thickness of the EMJ were compared to automated measurements performed by the algorithm on the same images.
RESULTS: For all three interfaces, the mean maximum manual measurement was less than the mean maximui computed measurement. The differences between the two measurements were not statistically significant (p = 0.275, 0.608 and 0.41 for the right wall, left wall, and fundus, respectively). The mean systematic and random errors ranged from 5.4% tol9.3% and 20.4 to 48.6%, respectively. Pearson correlations for the right wall, left wall and fundus (r = 0.642, p = 0.001; r = 0.730, p < 0.001, and r 0.694, p < 0.001, respectively) were good.
CONCLUSIONS: Maximum EMJ thickness measurements performed by the innovative Matla software algorithm are as accurate as manual measurements, and have the potential to reduce inter-observer variability.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The advanced image processing toolbox of the Matlab software package was used for identificiation and quantitative analysis of the EMJ area on three-dimensional (3D) rendered coronal plane uterine images, with clear-cut borders of the EMJ. The algorithm was used to process the images and calculate the geometric parameters characterizing the identified EM The manual measurements of the maximum thickness of the EMJ were compared to automated measurements performed by the algorithm on the same images.
RESULTS: For all three interfaces, the mean maximum manual measurement was less than the mean maximui computed measurement. The differences between the two measurements were not statistically significant (p = 0.275, 0.608 and 0.41 for the right wall, left wall, and fundus, respectively). The mean systematic and random errors ranged from 5.4% tol9.3% and 20.4 to 48.6%, respectively. Pearson correlations for the right wall, left wall and fundus (r = 0.642, p = 0.001; r = 0.730, p < 0.001, and r 0.694, p < 0.001, respectively) were good.
CONCLUSIONS: Maximum EMJ thickness measurements performed by the innovative Matla software algorithm are as accurate as manual measurements, and have the potential to reduce inter-observer variability.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app