We have located links that may give you full text access.
COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE
Is an FEV 1 of 80% predicted a normal spirometry in cystic fibrosis children and adults?
Clinical Respiratory Journal 2018 August
INTRODUCTION: FEV1 is considered the gold standard spirometric measure for the assessment and management of cystic fibrosis lung disease. Recent evidence suggests that tests at lower lung volumes may be more sensitive.
OBJECTIVES: To assess how many other spirometric tests are abnormal in the presence of a normal FEV1 (≥80%) and which spirometric tests are most sensitive in detecting airway obstruction.
METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of 3169 spirometry tests on 184 patients with cystic fibrosis aged 6-57 years. Tests were acceptable if they met ATS criteria.
RESULTS: Tests with normal FEV1 , FEF75 showed obstruction in 58% of tests, FEF25-75 in 31% and FEV1 /FVC ratio in 72%. Overall 75% of tests had an abnormality. FEF75 , FEF25-75 , FEF50 and FEV1 /FVC ratio were all significantly more sensitive in identifying obstruction than FEV1 . The FEV1 /FVC ratio was the most sensitive of all tests in identifying obstruction except in adults (> 20 years), in whom FEF75 at 90%, was more sensitive than the ratio at 85%. FEF25-75 was also at 85% sensitive. Even though the FEV1 /FVC ratio was the most sensitive of all tests, in the presence of a normal ratio, 35% other tests were abnormal.
CONCLUSIONS: Normal FEV1 , is not indicative of normal spirometry. FEV1 /FVC is the most sensitive measure of early or mild airway obstruction in children with cystic fibrosis. If only the FEV1 /FVC ratio was considered, many cases of obstruction would be missed, therefore all spirometric measures should be considered in the clinical evaluation of airway obstruction.
OBJECTIVES: To assess how many other spirometric tests are abnormal in the presence of a normal FEV1 (≥80%) and which spirometric tests are most sensitive in detecting airway obstruction.
METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of 3169 spirometry tests on 184 patients with cystic fibrosis aged 6-57 years. Tests were acceptable if they met ATS criteria.
RESULTS: Tests with normal FEV1 , FEF75 showed obstruction in 58% of tests, FEF25-75 in 31% and FEV1 /FVC ratio in 72%. Overall 75% of tests had an abnormality. FEF75 , FEF25-75 , FEF50 and FEV1 /FVC ratio were all significantly more sensitive in identifying obstruction than FEV1 . The FEV1 /FVC ratio was the most sensitive of all tests in identifying obstruction except in adults (> 20 years), in whom FEF75 at 90%, was more sensitive than the ratio at 85%. FEF25-75 was also at 85% sensitive. Even though the FEV1 /FVC ratio was the most sensitive of all tests, in the presence of a normal ratio, 35% other tests were abnormal.
CONCLUSIONS: Normal FEV1 , is not indicative of normal spirometry. FEV1 /FVC is the most sensitive measure of early or mild airway obstruction in children with cystic fibrosis. If only the FEV1 /FVC ratio was considered, many cases of obstruction would be missed, therefore all spirometric measures should be considered in the clinical evaluation of airway obstruction.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment.Clinical Research in Cardiology : Official Journal of the German Cardiac Society 2024 April 12
Proximal versus distal diuretics in congestive heart failure.Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2024 Februrary 30
World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification of eosinophilic disorders: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.American Journal of Hematology 2024 March 30
Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy in chronic insomnia: A review of clinical guidelines and case reports.Mental Health Clinician 2023 October
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app