Comparative Study
Journal Article
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Prospective comparison of 68 Ga-PSMA PET/CT, 18 F-sodium fluoride PET/CT and diffusion weighted-MRI at for the detection of bone metastases in biochemically recurrent prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: To prospectively compare diagnostic accuracies for detection of bone metastases by 68 Ga-PSMA PET/CT, 18 F-NaF PET/CT and diffusion-weighted MRI (DW600 -MRI) in prostate cancer (PCa) patients with biochemical recurrence (BCR).

METHODS: Sixty-eight PCa patients with BCR participated in this prospective study. The patients underwent 68 Ga-PSMA PET/CT, a 18 F-NaF PET/CT and a DW600 -MRI (performed in accordance with European Society of Urogenital Radiology guidelines, with b values of 0 and 600 s/mm2 ). Bone lesions were categorized using a three-point scale (benign, malignant or equivocal for metastases) and a dichotomous scale (benign or metastatic) for each imaging modality by at least two experienced observers. A best valuable comparator was defined for each patient based on study-specific imaging, at least 12 months of clinical follow-up and any imaging prior to the study and during follow-up. Diagnostic performance was assessed using a sensitivity analysis where equivocal lesions were handled as non-metastatic and then as metastatic.

RESULTS: Ten of the 68 patients were diagnosed with bone metastases. On a patient level, sensitivity, specificity and the area under the curve (AUC) by receiver operating characteristic analysis were, respectively, 0.80, 0.98-1.00 and 0.89-0.90 for 68 Ga-PSMA PET/CT (n = 68 patients); 0.90, 0.90-0.98 and 0.90-0.94 for 18 NaF PET/CT (n = 67 patients); and 0.25-0.38, 0.87-0.92 and 0.59-0.62 for DW600 -MRI (n = 60 patients). The diagnostic performance of DW600 -MRI was significantly lower than that of 68 Ga-PSMA PET/CT and 18 NaF PET/CT for diagnosing bone metastases (p < 0.01), and no significant difference in the AUC was seen between 68 Ga-PSMA PET/CT and 18 NaF PET/CT (p = 0.65).

CONCLUSION: 68 Ga-PSMA PET/CT and 18 F-NaF PET/CT showed comparable and high diagnostic accuracies for detecting bone metastases in PCa patients with BCR. Both methods performed significantly better than DW600 -MRI, which was inadequate for diagnosing bone metastases when conducted in accordance with European Society of Urogenital Radiology guidelines.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app