We have located links that may give you full text access.
Comparison of fibrotic response in the human lens capsular bag after femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery and conventional phacoemulsification.
PURPOSE: To compare the effect of different laser pulse energy settings in femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery with that of standard phacoemulsification and no energy at all used on posterior capsule opacification (PCO) in vitro.
SETTING: Cell and Molecular Biology Research Laboratory, Department of Ophthalmology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Real Eyes, Ophthalmology Center, Munich, and Institute for Clinical Pathology, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.
DESIGN: Experimental study.
METHODS: Fifteen cadaver capsular bags were cultivated from 8 human donors under standard cell culture conditions. For preparation of the capsular bag, 4 groups were established as follows: femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery standard energy (n = 3), femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery high energy (n = 3), phacoemulsification (n = 6), and hydrodissection without energy (extracapsular cataract extraction) (n = 3). Growth of lens epithelial cells was observed and photodocumented. The days until full cell coverage of the posterior capsule were documented. Capsular bags were stained for fibronectin, α-smooth muscle actin, and collagen type 1.
RESULTS: Cell growth patterns in all treatment groups were comparable, with no statistically significant differences detected at any timepoint measured (P = .81, Kruskal-Wallis). The markers for fibrosis were equally distributed in all groups, indicating an equal fibrotic reaction in all groups.
CONCLUSION: Femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery did not increase different cellular responses in PCO formation comparison with phacoemulsification in vitro, even when higher laser pulse energy levels were used.
SETTING: Cell and Molecular Biology Research Laboratory, Department of Ophthalmology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Real Eyes, Ophthalmology Center, Munich, and Institute for Clinical Pathology, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.
DESIGN: Experimental study.
METHODS: Fifteen cadaver capsular bags were cultivated from 8 human donors under standard cell culture conditions. For preparation of the capsular bag, 4 groups were established as follows: femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery standard energy (n = 3), femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery high energy (n = 3), phacoemulsification (n = 6), and hydrodissection without energy (extracapsular cataract extraction) (n = 3). Growth of lens epithelial cells was observed and photodocumented. The days until full cell coverage of the posterior capsule were documented. Capsular bags were stained for fibronectin, α-smooth muscle actin, and collagen type 1.
RESULTS: Cell growth patterns in all treatment groups were comparable, with no statistically significant differences detected at any timepoint measured (P = .81, Kruskal-Wallis). The markers for fibrosis were equally distributed in all groups, indicating an equal fibrotic reaction in all groups.
CONCLUSION: Femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery did not increase different cellular responses in PCO formation comparison with phacoemulsification in vitro, even when higher laser pulse energy levels were used.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app