Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Individualized breathlessness interventions may improve outcomes in patients with advanced COPD.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Many patients with advanced COPD experience refractory breathlessness and individualized breathlessness interventions may improve management of this complex symptom. The aims of this study were to develop, implement and assess the efficacy of a breathlessness intervention for patients with COPD and refractory breathlessness and to evaluate patient acceptability.

METHODS: An individualized breathlessness plan, information leaflets, breathlessness education and a hand-held fan were offered to consecutive patients with severe COPD and refractory breathlessness attending a tertiary integrated respiratory and palliative care service. Validated dyspnoea, quality of life and anxiety/depression questionnaires were administered at baseline and after 6 weeks, with change in dyspnoea scores being the primary outcome measure. A subset of patients participated in a structured telephone interview to qualitatively assess the intervention.

RESULTS: Twenty-six patients with severe COPD (mean forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1 ) 38%) were included, with a mean age of 74 years. Mean modified Medical Research Council Breathlessness Scale score was 3.5. Anxiety and depression were common, being present in 38% and 35% of participants. At 6 weeks, there was a clinically significant improvement in breathlessness severity as measured by the Numerical Rating Scale. The subset of patients with anxiety/depression also saw significant improvement in all domains of the Self-Administered Standardized Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire (CRQ-SAS). Patients reported that the intervention was highly useful and acceptable.

CONCLUSION: This feasibility study of individualized breathlessness interventions in patients with severe COPD and refractory breathlessness is the first to demonstrate a clinically significant reduction in dyspnoea scores, with high levels of patient acceptability.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app