Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Reliability of the Anterior Humeral Line Index Compared With the Gartland Classification for Posteriorly Hinged Supracondylar Humerus Fractures.

Orthopedics 2018 July 2
The Gartland classification of pediatric supracondylar humerus (SCH) fractures is commonly used but inconsistently defined regarding type 1 and type 2 (posteriorly hinged) SCH fractures. This study examined the reliability of the anterior humeral line (AHL) index compared with the Gartland classification. Fifty consecutive SCH fractures on anteroposterior and lateral elbow radiographs in pediatric patients (age range, 18 months to 15 years) were classified by 11 observers (9 attendings and 2 residents) according to the Gartland classification (types 1, 2, and 3) and the AHL index (AHL0, AHL passes anterior to the capitellum; AHL1, anterior one-third capitellum; and AHL2, middle one-third capitellum), with recommendations for treatment (cast immobilization vs surgery). Five attendings repeated the evaluation 4 to 6 weeks later. Interobserver and intraobserver reliability were scored using kappa statistics. Interobserver agreement for AHL with AHL1 and AHL2 combined (AHL1/2) was substantial (kappa=0.68) and moderate (kappa=0.55) when differentiating between AHL1 and AHL2. Anterior humeral line intraobserver reliability was almost perfect (kappa=0.83). Overall interobserver agreement on Gartland fracture type was fair (kappa=0.36), with type 2 fractures having the lowest (kappa=0.27), and with substantial (kappa=0.71) intraobserver reliability. For treatment, the interobserver agreement was fair (kappa=0.39), with substantial intraobserver reliability (kappa=0.72). Observers agreed more when using the AHL index than when using the Gartland classification. Observers differed on the degree of extension in posteriorly hinged SCH fractures that requires closed reduction. The AHL index is a more consistent method than the Gartland classification in differentiating posteriorly hinged SCH fractures and may be useful in guiding treatment. [Orthopedics. 2018; 41(4):e502-e505.].

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app