We have located links that may give you full text access.
Adult Versus Pediatric Tethered Cord Syndrome: Clinicoradiological Differences and its Management.
Asian Journal of Neurosurgery 2018 April
Background: Dysraphic lesions in adults, presenting clinically as tethered cord syndrome (TCS), are relatively rare, and their optimal management remains controversial.
Patients and Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of our pediatric database over a period of last 7 years to focus on the adult TCS. Our aim was to determine the clinicoradiological and etiopathological differences between adult and pediatric patients as well as to determine the results of surgery in adult TCS.
Results: Adult spinal dysraphisms constituted 15.4% of our patients (20 out of 130). Motor weakness, sphincteric dysfunction, and backache ( n = 13, 65.0% each) predominated in adults unlike children who presented with subcutaneous swellings ( n = 74, 67.6%) followed by motor weakness ( n = 40, 46.4%), backache being reported by only three patients. The different pathologic substrates underlying adult dysraphisms were lipomeningocele ( n = 8), split cord malformation (total = 7; Type 1: n = 5; Type 2: n = 2), dermal sinus ( n = 2), and fatty filum ( n = 3). On the other hand, meningomyelocele/meningocele (61, 54.9%) followed by split cord malformation Type 1 and 2 ( n = 29, 26.1%) predominated in children. The radiological differences between the two groups were a higher incidence of vertebral body defects (hemivertebrae and butterfly vertebrae) and lack of intracranial anomalies in adults. At a mean follow-up of 20.5 months, the most common symptoms to improve following detethering were pain (11 out of 13, 84.6%) followed by motor weakness (six out of 13, 56.2%) and sphincteric control (7 out of 13, 53.8%).
Conclusion: Most common symptoms to improve following detethering in adult TCS were pain followed by motor weakness. The major radiological differences between these two groups were a higher incidence of vertebral body defects (hemivertebrae and butterfly vertebrae) and lack of intracranial anomalies in adults.
Patients and Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of our pediatric database over a period of last 7 years to focus on the adult TCS. Our aim was to determine the clinicoradiological and etiopathological differences between adult and pediatric patients as well as to determine the results of surgery in adult TCS.
Results: Adult spinal dysraphisms constituted 15.4% of our patients (20 out of 130). Motor weakness, sphincteric dysfunction, and backache ( n = 13, 65.0% each) predominated in adults unlike children who presented with subcutaneous swellings ( n = 74, 67.6%) followed by motor weakness ( n = 40, 46.4%), backache being reported by only three patients. The different pathologic substrates underlying adult dysraphisms were lipomeningocele ( n = 8), split cord malformation (total = 7; Type 1: n = 5; Type 2: n = 2), dermal sinus ( n = 2), and fatty filum ( n = 3). On the other hand, meningomyelocele/meningocele (61, 54.9%) followed by split cord malformation Type 1 and 2 ( n = 29, 26.1%) predominated in children. The radiological differences between the two groups were a higher incidence of vertebral body defects (hemivertebrae and butterfly vertebrae) and lack of intracranial anomalies in adults. At a mean follow-up of 20.5 months, the most common symptoms to improve following detethering were pain (11 out of 13, 84.6%) followed by motor weakness (six out of 13, 56.2%) and sphincteric control (7 out of 13, 53.8%).
Conclusion: Most common symptoms to improve following detethering in adult TCS were pain followed by motor weakness. The major radiological differences between these two groups were a higher incidence of vertebral body defects (hemivertebrae and butterfly vertebrae) and lack of intracranial anomalies in adults.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app