JOURNAL ARTICLE

Early feasibility of hypoglossal nerve upper airway stimulator in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices and continuous positive airway pressure-intolerant severe obstructive sleep apnea

Valay Parikh, Erica Thaler, Masanari Kato, M Boyd Gillespie, Shaun Nguyen, Kirk Withrow, David Calhoun, Ryan Soose, Damien Stevens, Suzanne Stevens, Chris Larsen, Madhu Reddy, Dhanunjaya Lakkireddy
Heart Rhythm: the Official Journal of the Heart Rhythm Society 2018, 15 (8): 1165-1170
29678782

BACKGROUND: Implantable hypoglossal nerve upper airway stimulation (HNS) is a novel strategy approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the management of moderate-to-severe obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in patients with continuous positive airway pressure therapy intolerance or failure. Because of the proximity of a cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) to this stimulator, interaction between these devices is theoretically possible.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess interactions between an implantable HNS device and a CIED.

METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 14 ad hoc patients with continuous positive airway pressure-intolerant, moderate-to-severe OSA and pre-existing transvenous CIEDs undergoing HNS implantation (Inspire II, Inspire Medical Systems). We assessed these devices for their pre and postimplant OSA outcomes and for possible device-device interaction. All patients were followed up for 1 year.

RESULTS: Of the 14 patients, 9 had a pacemaker (8 dual-chamber, 1 single-chamber), 4 had an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (2 dual-chamber, 1 single-chamber), and 1 had a cardiac resynchronization therapy device. All the HNS devices were implanted on the opposite side of the CIED. All CIEDs were programmed bipolar. HNS were programmed either unipolar or bipolar. During implant, intraoperative testing was performed to confirm that bipolar and unipolar HNS stimulation did not impact CIED sensing. During the follow-up period, no oversensing episodes were noted on the CIEDs.

CONCLUSION: In this early experience, simultaneous use of a novel hypoglossal nerve upper airway stimulation device with transvenous CIEDs seems to be safe, effective, and without any device-device interactions.

Full Text Links

Find Full Text Links for this Article

Discussion

You are not logged in. Sign Up or Log In to join the discussion.

Trending Papers

Remove bar
Read by QxMD icon Read
29678782
×

Save your favorite articles in one place with a free QxMD account.

×

Search Tips

Use Boolean operators: AND/OR

diabetic AND foot
diabetes OR diabetic

Exclude a word using the 'minus' sign

Virchow -triad

Use Parentheses

water AND (cup OR glass)

Add an asterisk (*) at end of a word to include word stems

Neuro* will search for Neurology, Neuroscientist, Neurological, and so on

Use quotes to search for an exact phrase

"primary prevention of cancer"
(heart or cardiac or cardio*) AND arrest -"American Heart Association"