We have located links that may give you full text access.
Impact of a Geometric Correction for Proximal Flow Constraint on the Assessment of Mitral Regurgitation Severity Using the Proximal Flow Convergence Method.
Journal of Cardiovascular Ultrasound 2018 March
BACKGROUND: Overestimation of the severity of mitral regurgitation (MR) by the proximal isovelocity surface area (PISA) method has been reported. We sought to test whether angle correction (AC) of the constrained flow field is helpful to eliminate overestimation in patients with eccentric MR.
METHODS: In a total of 33 patients with MR due to prolapse or flail mitral valve, both echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance image (CMR) were performed to calculate regurgitant volume (RV). In addition to RV by conventional PISA (RVPISA ), convergence angle (α) was measured from 2-dimensional Doppler color flow maps and RV was corrected by multiplying by α/180 (RVAC ). RV measured by CMR (RVCMR ) was used as a gold standard, which was calculated by the difference between total stroke volume measured by planimetry of the short axis slices and aortic stroke volume by phase-contrast image.
RESULTS: The correlation between RVCMR and RV by echocardiography was modest [RVCMR vs. RVPISA (r = 0.712, p < 0.001) and RVCMR vs. RVAC (r = 0.766, p < 0.001)]. However, RVPISA showed significant overestimation (RVPISA - RVCMR = 50.6 ± 40.6 mL vs. RVAC - RVCMR = 7.7 ± 23.4 mL, p < 0.001). The overall accuracy of RVPISA for diagnosis of severe MR, defined as RV ≥ 60 mL, was 57.6% (19/33), whereas it increased to 84.8% (28/33) by using RVAC ( p = 0.028).
CONCLUSION: Conventional PISA method tends to provide falsely large RV in patients with eccentric MR and a simple geometric AC of the proximal constraint flow largely eliminates overestimation.
METHODS: In a total of 33 patients with MR due to prolapse or flail mitral valve, both echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance image (CMR) were performed to calculate regurgitant volume (RV). In addition to RV by conventional PISA (RVPISA ), convergence angle (α) was measured from 2-dimensional Doppler color flow maps and RV was corrected by multiplying by α/180 (RVAC ). RV measured by CMR (RVCMR ) was used as a gold standard, which was calculated by the difference between total stroke volume measured by planimetry of the short axis slices and aortic stroke volume by phase-contrast image.
RESULTS: The correlation between RVCMR and RV by echocardiography was modest [RVCMR vs. RVPISA (r = 0.712, p < 0.001) and RVCMR vs. RVAC (r = 0.766, p < 0.001)]. However, RVPISA showed significant overestimation (RVPISA - RVCMR = 50.6 ± 40.6 mL vs. RVAC - RVCMR = 7.7 ± 23.4 mL, p < 0.001). The overall accuracy of RVPISA for diagnosis of severe MR, defined as RV ≥ 60 mL, was 57.6% (19/33), whereas it increased to 84.8% (28/33) by using RVAC ( p = 0.028).
CONCLUSION: Conventional PISA method tends to provide falsely large RV in patients with eccentric MR and a simple geometric AC of the proximal constraint flow largely eliminates overestimation.
Full text links
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app