Journal Article
Observational Study
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Evaluation of the fluid responsiveness in patients with septic shock by ultrasound plus the passive leg raising test.

BACKGROUND: Prompt, accurate, and noninvasive prediction of fluid responsiveness is still lacking in intensive care unit. This study is to investigate the value of the Doppler ultrasound evaluation of variation in brachial artery peak velocity (VVpeakbrach ) and passive leg raising (PLR)-induced changes in the brachial artery peak velocity (ΔVpeakPLR ) in predicting the fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients with severe sepsis or septic shock.

METHODS: A prospective study was conducted involving 62 patients. Semirecumbent positioning, PLR, and a return to the semirecumbent position were performed with all patients before volume expansion. VVpeakbrach , ΔVpeakPLR , and stroke volume were observed by Doppler ultrasound. A patient with an increase of ≥15% in the stroke volume on volume expansion was defined as a responder. The predictive value was evaluated on the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis.

RESULTS: A total of 28 patients were classified as responders. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of ΔVpeakPLR and VVpeakbrach was 0.898 and 0.891, respectively. A ΔVpeakPLR value of more than 10.6% predicted the fluid responsiveness with a sensitivity of 82.1% and a specificity of 88.2%. A VVpeakbrach value of more than 10.95% predicted the fluid responsiveness with a sensitivity of 78.6% and a specificity of 91.2%. The positive predictive value was 94.4% when both were positive. In contrast, the negative predictive value was 96.6%.

CONCLUSIONS: Doppler ultrasound evaluation of VVpeakbrach and ΔVpeakPLR could be a feasible method for the noninvasive assessment of fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients with severe sepsis or septic shock. The combination of two indicators can improve the predictive value.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app