We have located links that may give you full text access.
Journal Article
Observational Study
Initial electrical frequency predicts survival and neurological outcome in out of hospital cardiac arrest patients with pulseless electrical activity.
Resuscitation 2018 April
BACKGROUND: Outcome is generally poor in out of hospital cardiac arrests (OHCA) with initial non-shockable rhythms. Termination of resuscitation rules facilitate early prognostication at the scene to cease resuscitation attempts in futile situations and to proceed advanced life support in promising conditions. As pulseless electrical activity (PEA) is present as first rhythm in every 4th OHCA we were interested if the initial electrical frequency in PEA predicts survival.
METHODS: All patients >18 years of age with non-traumatic OHCA and PEA as first rhythm between August 2013 and August 2015 from the Vienna Cardiac Arrest Registry were included in this retrospective observational study. Defibrillator and epidemiological data from the emergency medical system as survival data were processed considering the initial electrical activity in PEA and 30 days survival.
RESULTS: Out of 2149 OHCA patients, a total of 504 PEA patients were eligible for analyses. These patients were stratified into 4 groups according the initial electrical frequency in PEA: 10-24/min, 25-39/min, 40-59/min, >60/min. Compared to a frequency >60/min all other subgroups were associated with higher mortality especially those with an initial electrical frequency 10-24 (adjusted OR 0.56 (0.39-0.79) p = .001 for each category chance). QRS duration in PEA did not influence outcome. Patients in the >60/min group showed a 30-days-survival rate of 22% and a good neurological outcome in 15% of all patients - comparable to shockable cardiac arrest rhythms.
CONCLUSION: Regardless of other resuscitation factors, higher initial electrical frequency in PEA is associated with increased odds of survival and good neurological outcome.
METHODS: All patients >18 years of age with non-traumatic OHCA and PEA as first rhythm between August 2013 and August 2015 from the Vienna Cardiac Arrest Registry were included in this retrospective observational study. Defibrillator and epidemiological data from the emergency medical system as survival data were processed considering the initial electrical activity in PEA and 30 days survival.
RESULTS: Out of 2149 OHCA patients, a total of 504 PEA patients were eligible for analyses. These patients were stratified into 4 groups according the initial electrical frequency in PEA: 10-24/min, 25-39/min, 40-59/min, >60/min. Compared to a frequency >60/min all other subgroups were associated with higher mortality especially those with an initial electrical frequency 10-24 (adjusted OR 0.56 (0.39-0.79) p = .001 for each category chance). QRS duration in PEA did not influence outcome. Patients in the >60/min group showed a 30-days-survival rate of 22% and a good neurological outcome in 15% of all patients - comparable to shockable cardiac arrest rhythms.
CONCLUSION: Regardless of other resuscitation factors, higher initial electrical frequency in PEA is associated with increased odds of survival and good neurological outcome.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Infection versus disease activity in systemic lupus erythematosus patients with fever.BMC rheumatology. 2024 August 14
Perioperative Management of Patients Taking Direct Oral Anticoagulants: A Review.JAMA 2024 August 12
Aspiration under anesthesia: what happens after we sound the glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist alarm?Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia 2024 August 26
An Updated Review of the Management of Chronic Heart Failure in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease.Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine 2024 April
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app